Validación de una encuesta sobre la actividad docente en Educación Superior

  1. Bol Arreba, Alfredo
  2. Sáiz Manzanares, María Consuelo
  3. Pérez Mateos, Manuel
Journal:
Aula abierta

ISSN: 0210-2773

Year of publication: 2013

Volume: 41

Issue: 2

Pages: 45-54

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Aula abierta

Abstract

Higher Education Institutions need to know students� perception on the learning-teaching process. Measurement tools should be reliable and valid. This paper relies on a sample of five thousand five hundred fifty-one students distributed in five different centres at the University of Burgos. The aims are: 1) To study the reliability of teaching surveys -adaptation of Student Evaluation of Educational Quality (SEEQ) - Short version-. 2) To analyse if there are significant differences among faculties. We have found significant differences among all faculties in nine of the items observed, but no significant difference can be found in the last item (course workload). The reliability of the survey was .92. The most valued aspects by students were lecturers� availability for out-classroom activities. The less valued aspect was assessment procedures and the usefulness�s materials of the courses.

Bibliographic References

  • Biggs, J. (2006). Calidad del aprendizaje universitario. Madrid : Narcea.
  • Campbell, D. T., y Stanley, J. C. (2005). Diseños experimentales y cuasi-experimentales en la investigación social. Buenos Aires : Amorrortu.
  • Centra, J. A. (2003). Will Teachers Receive Higher Student Evaluations by Giving Higher Grades and Less Course Work? Research in Higher Education, 44(5), 495-518.
  • Hattie, J. (2002). What are the attributes of excellent teachers? En New Zealand Council for Educational Research, Teachers make a difference : what is the research evidence? (pp. 3-26). Wellington : NZCER.
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of 800+ meta-analyses on archievement. Oxford, UK : Routledge.
  • Hattie, J., y Gan, M. (2011). Instruction based on feedback En R. E. Mayer y P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of Research on learning and instruction. Educational Psychology Handbook series (pp. 249-271). New York : Routedge.
  • Knight, T. (2005). El profesorado de Educación Superior. Formación para la excelencia. Madrid : Narcea.
  • Kuzmanovic, M., Savic, G., Gusavac, B. A., Makajic-Nikolic, D., y Panic, B. (2013). A Conjoint-based approach to student evaluations of teaching performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 4083-4089. doi.org/10.1016/j .esw.2013.01.039
  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students’ evaluations of university teaching : Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253-288.
  • Marsh, H. W. (1994). Weighting for the right criteria in the Instructional Development and Effectiveness Assessment (IDEA) system : Global and specific ratings of teaching effectiveness and their relation to course objectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 631-648.
  • Marsh, H. W. (2007). Students’ evaluations of university teaching : a multidimensional perspective. En R. P. Perry y J C. Smart (Ed.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education : an evidence-based perspective (pp.319-384). New York : Springer.
  • Marsh, H. W., y Hattie, J. (2002). The relationship between research productivity and teaching effectiveness : complentary, antagonistic or independent constructs. Journal of Higher education, 73, 603-643.
  • Marsh H. W., y Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students ‘evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. American Psychologist, 52, 1187- 1197.
  • Marsh, H. W., y Roche, L. A. (1993). The use of students’ evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 217–251.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667-686.
  • Pintrich, P. R., y Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education : theory research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall.
  • Rodrigo-Alsina, M., y Almiron, R. (2013). Auto-percepción de la adquisición de competencias de los estudiantes de periodismo. El caso de la Universidad Pompeu Fabra. Aula Abierta, 41(1), 99-110.
  • Sáiz, M.C., Montero, E., Bol, A., y Carbonero, M. A. (2012). An analysis of Learning Competences at the University. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10(1), 253- 270.
  • Sáiz, M. C., y Payo, R. J. (2012). Autopercepción del conocimiento en Educación Superior. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud. 3(2), 159-174.
  • Sáiz, M. C., y Román, J. M. (2011). Cuatro formas de evaluación en educación superior gestionadas desde la tutoría. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 16(1), 145-161.
  • Stufflebeam, D. L., y Shinkfield, A. J. (1987). Evaluación sistemática : Guía teórico-práctica. Madrid : Paidós.
Data source: Dialnet