Social skills and moral values in engineering education

  1. Pedro Luis Sánchez Ortega
  2. Jose María Cámara Nebreda
  3. César Represa Pérez
Journal of accessibility and design for all: JACCES

ISSN: 2013-7087

Year of publication: 2013

Volume: 3

Issue: 1

Pages: 28-43

Type: Article

More publications in: Journal of accessibility and design for all: JACCES



  • Social Sciences: B


All technical degrees in the Spanish Higher Educational System include a mandatory Final or Honours project. This is a technical activity which should lead the student to put into practice most of the skills acquired throughout the whole degree. Only technical skills are usually put into practice, although recent studies have proved that further capabilities, such as those included in the category of “social skills”, will also be demanded by employers. Moreover, the introduction of the European Higher Educational System, strongly emphasizes the importance of this sort of capabilities. What we present in this work is a way to include both social skills and moral values in the Honours Project without any loss of its technical character. To do so we have launched a line of projects devoted to the development of technical aids to improve the welfare of disabled people. Collaboration agreements with nonprofit institutions and charities give us access to the needs of these communities and the opportunity to apply the results of the projects. A procedure to manage projects of this kind is also presented.

Bibliographic References

  • Azapagic, A., Perdan, S. & Shallcross, D. (2005). How much do engineering [1] students know about sustainable development? the findings of an international survey and possible implications for the engineering curriculum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30 (1). 1–19.
  • Beder, S. (1998). The New Engineer. Sidney: Macmillan. [2]
  • Capobianco, B.M. et al., (2011). What is an Engineer? Implications of [3] elementary school student conceptions for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100 (2). 304–328.
  • Conlon, E. (2008), The new engineer: between employability and social [4] responsibility. European Journal of Engineering Education, 20 (2). 151–159.
  • Consejería de Familia e Igualdad de Oportunidades (2007). RESOLUCIÓN de [5] 6 de junio de 2007, de la Gerencia de Servicios Sociales, por la que se acuerda la concesión de los “Premios de Accesibilidad de Castilla y León, Edición 2007”. Boletín Oficial de Castilla y León, 111. 12508–12509.
  • Dawson, C.W. (1999). The essence of computing projects: A student’s [6] guide. New York: Prentice Hall.
  • Enderle, J.D., (1999). An overview of the National Science Foundation [7] Program on senior design projects to aid persons with disabilities. International Journal of Engineering Education, 15 (4). 288–297.
  • EPICS: IEEE Engineering Projects in Community Service program, (2012). [8] Retrieved from: preuniversity/epics_high.html.
  • Fundación DFA, (2012). Retrieved from: [9]
  • Godino-Llorente, J. et al., (2012), “Design for All in the context of the [10] information society”: Integration of a specialist course in a generalist M.Sc. program in Electrical and Electronics Engineering. IEEE Trans. Education, 55 (1). 107–117.
  • Johnston, S.F., Gostelow, J.P. & King , W.J. (2000). Engineering and [11] society. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Lathem, S.A. et al., (2011). The socially responsible engineer: assessing [12] student attitudes of roles ans responsibilities. Journal of Engineering Education, 100 (3). 444–474.
  • Markes, I. (2006). A review of the literature on employability skill needs in [13] engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31 (6). 637–650.
  • Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (2007). REAL DECRETO 1393/2007, de 29 [14] de octubre, por el que se establece la ordenación de las enseñanzas universitarias oficiales. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 260. 44037–44048.
  • OTRI-OTC, (2012). Retrieved from: [15]
  • Palmer, S.R. (2003). Framework for undergraduate engineering [16] management studies. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Educational Practice, 129 (2). 92–99.
  • Pressman, R.S. (2010). Software engineering: a practitioner's approach. [17] New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
  • Sanchez, P.L., Camara, J.M. and Represa C. (2010). Ayudas técnicas a la [18] discapacidad como compromiso de sostenibilidad en la universidad. Proceedings of 18th Congreso Universitario de Innovación en las Enseñanzas Técnicas. 1–12.
  • Sanchez, P.L., Camara, J.M. and Represa C. (2011). Ayudas técnicas a [19] discapacidades específicas. Proceedings of 19th Congreso Universitario de Innovación en las Enseñanzas Técnicas. 1371–1382.
  • Standen, P.J., Camm, C., Battersby, S., Brown, D.J. & Harrison, M. (2011). [20] An evaluation of the Wii nunchuk as an alternative assistive device for people with intellectual and physical disabilities using switch controlled software. Computers and Education, 56 (1). 2–10.
  • Wii Official Site, (2012). Retrieved from: [21]