Docentes e investigadores en comunidades virtuales de práctica para el desarrollo profesional docente y la mejoría de la enseñanza de las ciencias

Referencias bibliográficas

• Almeida, M. C. (2014). Colaboração entre pesquisadores e professores de ensino de ciências e biologia: Um estudo da organização e desenvolvimento da prática social do grupo CoPPEC. Salvador/Feira de Santana: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ensino, Filosofia e História das Ciências (UFBA/UEFS), Dissertação de mestrado.
• Barab, S. A., Barnett, M. y Squire, K. (2002). Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: characterizing the essential tensions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, pp. 489–542.
• Briscoe, C. (1991). The dynamic interactions among beliefs, role metaphors and teaching practices. A case study of teacher change. Science Education, 75(2), pp. 185–199.
• Brown, S. y McIntyre, D. (1993). Making Sense of Teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.
• Brown, S. (2005). How can research inform ideas of good practice in teaching? The contributions of some official initiatives in the UK. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(3), pp. 383-405.
• Cachapuz, A. F. (2000). Investigação em didáctica das ciências em Portugal um balanço crítico. En Pimenta, S. G. (Org.) Didática e formação de professores: percursos e perspectivas no Brasil e em Portugal. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.
• Dalgarno, N. y Colgan, L. (2007). Supporting novice elementary mathematics teachers’ induction in professional communities and providing innovative forms of pedagogical content knowledge development through information and communication technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, pp. 1051–1065.
• Dori, Y. J. y Herscovitz, O. (2005). Case‐based Long‐term Professional Development of Science Teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (12), pp. 1413-1446.
• Eick, C. y Dias, M. (2005). Building the authority of experience: the development of preservice teachers’ practical knowledge through coteaching in inquiry classrooms. Science Teacher Education, 89(3), pp. 470–491.
• El-Hani, C. N. y Greca, I. M. (2011). Participação em uma comunidade virtual de prática desenhada como meio de diminuir a lacuna pesquisa-prática na educação em biologia. Ciência & Educação, 17(3), pp. 579–601.
• El-Hani, C. N. y Greca, I. M. (2013). COMPRATICA: A virtual community of practice for promoting biology teachers' professional development in Brazil. Research in Science Education, 43 (4), pp.1327–1352.
• Elster, D. (2009). Biology in context: teachers’ professional development in learning communities. Journal of Biological Education, 43(1), pp. 53–61.
• Hargreaves, D. H. (1999). The knowledge-creating school. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47, pp. 122–144.
• Harrison, C., Hofstein, A., Eylon, B.-S. y Simon, S. (2008). Evidence-based professional development of science teachers in two countries. International Journal of Science Education, 30(5), pp. 577–591.
• Hemsley-Brown, J. y Sharp, C. (2003). The Use of Research to Improve Professional Practice: a systematic review of the literature. Oxford Review of Education, 29 (4), pp. 449-471.
• Jenkins, E. W. (2000) Research in Science Education: Time for a Health Check? Studies in Science Education, 35, pp. 1-25.
• Lave, J. y Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Louis, K.S. (1996). Reconnecting knowledge utilisation and school improvement: two steps forward, one step back. En Hargreaves, A. et al. (Eds) International Handbook on School Improvement. London: Cassell.
• Mansour, N., EL-Deghaidy, H., Alshamrani, S. y Aldahmash, A. (2014). Rethinking the Theory and Practice of Continuing Professional Development: Science Teachers’ Perspectives. Research in Science Education. Publish On Line First DOI 10.1007/s11165-014-9409-y
• McIntyre, D. (2005). Bridging the gap between research and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35, pp. 357–382.
• Mellado, V. (1998). La investigación sobre el profesorado de ciencias experimentales. En Banet, E y de Pro, A. (Eds.). Investigación e Innovación en la Enseñanza de las Ciencias (vol.I) (pp. 272–283). Murcia: Diego Marín.
• Miretzky, D. (2007). A view of research from practice: voices of teachers. Theory into Practice, 46, pp. 272–280.
• Moreira, M. A. (1998). Investigación básica en educación en ciencias: una visión personal. Conferencia dictada en el I Congreso Iberoamericano de Educación en Ciencias Experimentales, La Serena, Chile, 06 al 10 de julio de 1998,
• National Research Council (2008). Research on Future Skill Demands. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.
• Nielsen, J. (2006). Participation inequality: Encouraging more users to contribute. In: Nielsen’s Alertbox Column on Web Usability, Disponible en http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html, 9 de octubre de 2006.
• Osborne, J. F.y Dillon, J. (2008). Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation.
• Ostermeier, C., Prenzel, M. y Duit, R. (2010). Improving science & mathematics instruction—the SINUS project as an example for reform as teacher professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), pp. 303–327.
• Parchmann, I., Gräsel, C., Baer, A., Nentwig, P., Demuth, R. y Ralle, B. (2006). Chemie im Kontext—a symbiotic implementation of a context-based teaching and learning approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), pp. 1041–1062.
• Richmond, G. & Manokore, V. (2011). Identifying elements critical for functional and sustainable professional learning communities. Science Education, 95, pp. 543–570.
• Rocard, M. et al. (2007). Science Education Now: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. Bruselas: Directorate General for Research, Science, Economy and Society.
• Sarmento, A. C. H., Muniz, C. R. R., Silva, N. R., Pereira, V. A., Santana, M. A. S., Sá, T. S. y El-Hani, C. N. (2013). Investigando princípios de design de uma sequência didática sobre metabolismo energético. Ciência & Educação, 19, pp. 573-598.
• Schlager, M. S. y Fusco, J. (2004). Teacher professional technology, and communities of practice: are we putting the cart before the horse? En Barab, S., Kling, R. y Gray, J. (Eds.), Designing virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 235–256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Schlager, M. S., Fusco, J. y Schank, P. (2002). Evolution of an on-line education community of practice. En Renninger, K. A. y Shumar, W. (Eds.), Building virtual communities: learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 129–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Sepulveda, C. A. S., Muniz, C. R. R., Reis, V. P. G. S., Teles-Junior, J. B., Carneiro, M. C. L., Pereira, V. A., Caldas, T. C., Almeida, M. C., Sá, T. S., Amarante, A. L. A. C. P., Costa, V. J. B., Silva, N. R., Santana, M. A. S., Sarmento, A. C. H. y El-Hani, C. N. (2012). Inovando o ensino de biologia através do trabalho colaborativo de pesquisadores educacionais e professores-investigadores. Estudos IAT, 2, pp. 119-137.
• Vanderlinde, R. y Van Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36, pp. 299–316.
• Wisker, G., Robinson, G. y Shacham, M. (2007). Postgraduate research success: communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online communities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, pp. 301–320.