La estructura financiera de la empresa familiar y el cambio generacional

  1. Blanco Mazagatos, Virginia
  2. Quevedo Puente, Esther de
  3. Delgado García, Juan Bautista
Revista:
Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

ISSN: 0210-2412

Año de publicación: 2009

Número: 141

Páginas: 57-73

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1080/02102412.2009.10779662 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Este trabajo analiza una muestra de 672 empresas no financieras pertenecientes a la Comunidad Autónoma de Castilla y León para evidenciar el efecto que ejerce el deseo de perpetuar el control familiar sobre la estructura financiera de las empresas familiares y realiza dos grandes contribuciones. En primer lugar, se comprueba que esta premisa de trascendencia genera en la empresa familiar un orden de preferencias de financiación acorde con la establecida por la Teoría del Pecking Order. En segundo lugar, aunque con los cambios generacionales se mantiene el deseo de control familiar, el debilitamiento de los lazos reduce la capacidad de sacrificio de los miembros familiares y, por tanto, varía la ponderación de las fuentes de financiación.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ANDERSON, R. C.; MANSI, S. A., y REEB, D. M. 2003. Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics 68(2):63-285.
  • ANDERSON, R. C., y REEB, D. M. 2003a. Founding-family ownership, corporate diversifi cation, and fi rm leverage. Journal of Law and Economics 46(2):653-680.
  • ANDERSON, R. C., y REEB, D. M. 2003b. Founding family ownership and fi rm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance 58(3):1301-1328.
  • AGRAWAL, A., y NAGARAJAN, N. J. 1990. Corporate capital structure, agency costs, and ownership control: The case of all-equity fi rms. Journal of Finance 45(4):1325-1331.
  • ARONOFF, C. E., y WARD, J. L. 1995. Family-owned businesses: A thing of the past or a model for the future? Family Business Review 8(2):121-130.
  • BARTON, S. L., y GORDON, P. J. 1987. Corporate strategy: Useful perspective for the study of capital structure? Academy of Management Review 12(1):67-75.
  • BARTON, S. L., y MATTHEWS, C. H. 1989. Small fi rm fi nancing: Implications from a strategic management perspective. Journal of Small Business Management 27(1):1-7.
  • CABRERA-SUáREZ, K., y SANTANA-MARTíN, D. J. 2004. Governance in Spanish family business. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research 10(2):141-163.
  • CARNEY, M. 2005. Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled fi rms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29(3):249-265.
  • CHAGANTI, R., y DAMANPOUR, F. 1991. Institutional ownership, capital structure and fi rm performance. Strategic Management Journal 12(7):479-491.
  • CHURCHILL, N., y HATTEN, K. 1987. Non-market based transfers of wealth and power: A research framework for family business. American Journal of Small Business Management 11(3):51-64.
  • COLEMAN, S., y CARSKY, M. 1999. Sources of capital for small family-owned businesses: Evidence from the national survey of small business fi nances. Family Business Review 12(1):73-85.
  • CORBETTA, G. 1995. atterns of development of family businesses in Italy, Family Business Review, 8 (4), 255-265.
  • DALTON, D. R., y DAILY, C. M. 1992. Financial performance of founder-managed versus professionally managed corporations. Journal of Small Business Economics 30(2):25-34.
  • DE JONG, A., y VELD, C. 2001. An empirical analysis of incremental capital structure decisions under managerial entrenchment. Journal of Banking and Finance 25(10):1857-1895.
  • DEMARIS, A. 1992. Logit modeling: Practical applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • DEMSETZ, H., y LEHN, K. 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93(6):155-1177.
  • DONALDSON, G. 1961. Corporate debt capacity: A study of corporate debt policy and the determination of corporate debt capacity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Division of Research.
  • FERNáNDEZ, Z., y NIETO, M. J. 2005. La estrategia de internacionalización de la pequeña empresa familiar. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 22(1):107-125.
  • GALVE, C., y SALAS, V. 2003. La empresa familiar en España. Fundamentos Económicos y Resultados. Bilbao: Fundación BBVA.
  • - 2005. Family ownership and performance: The net effect of productive efficiency and growth constraints. European Corporate Governance Institute-Finance Working Paper: 66.
  • GALLO, M. A., y GARCíA PONT, C. 1989. La empresa familiar en la economía española. Papeles de Economía Española 39:67-85.
  • GALLO, M. A.; TáPIES, J., y CAPPUYNS, K. 2004. Comparison of family and nonfamily business: Financial logic and personal preferences. Family Business Review 17(4):03-318.
  • GERSICK, K. E.; DAVIS, J. A., MCCOLLOM, M., y LANSBERG, I 1997. Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • GRIER, P., y ZYCHOWICZ, E. 1994. Institutional Investors, corporate discipline and the role of debt. Journal of Economics and Business 46(1):1-11.
  • HABBERSHON, T. G., y WILLIAMS, M. L. 1999. A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family fi rms. Family Business Review 12(1):1-25.
  • HAIR, J. F.; ANDERSON, R. E.; TATHAM, R. L., y BLACK, W. C. 1995. Multivariate data analysis: With readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • HAMILTON, R. T., y FOX, M. A. 1998. The fi nancing preferences of small fi rm owners, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research 4(3):239-248.
  • HARRIS, M., y RAVIV, A. 1990. Capital structure and the informational role of debt. Journal of Finance 45(2):321-349.
  • HOLTZ-EAKIN, D.; JOULFAIAN, D., y ROSEN, H. S.. 1993. The Carnegie conjecture: Some empirical evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(2):413-435.
  • HOSKISSON, R. E.; HITT, M. A., y IRELAND, R. D. 2004. Competing for advantage. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
  • JENSEN, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash fl ow, corporate fi nance, and takeovers. American Economic Review 76(2):323-329.
  • JENSEN, M. C., y MECKLING, W. 1976. Theory of the fi rm: Managerial behaviour, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(2):4-19.
  • KARRA, N.; TRACEY, P., y PHILLIPS, N. 2006. Altruism and agency in the family fi rm: Exploring the role of family, kinship and ethnicity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30(6):861-877.
  • KLEIMAN, R.; LANGE, J.; LELEUX, B.; PETTY, W., y SHULMAN, J. 1996. An index of family controlled publicly traded companies. Boston, MA: Frontiers of Entrepreneurial Research. Badson College.
  • LA PORTA, R.; LOPEZ-DE-SILANES, F.; SHLEIFER, A., y VISHNY, R. W. 1998. Law and fi nance. Journal of Political Economy 106(6):1113-1155.
  • LITZ, R. A. 1995. The family business: Toward defi nitional clarity. Family Business Review 8(2):71-82.
  • LóPEZ-GRACIA, J., y AYBAR-ARIAS, C. 2000. An empirical approach to the fi nancial behaviour of small and medium sized companies. Small Business Economics 14(1):55-63.
  • LUBATKIN, M.; SCHULZE, W.; LING, Y., y DINO, R. 2005. The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family-managed fi rms. Journal of Organizational Behavior 26(3):313-330.
  • LYAGOUBI, M. 2006. Family firms and financial behavior: How family shareholder preferences influence firms' financing, en Poutziouris, P. Z.; Smyrnios, K. X., y Klein, S. B. (Eds.): Handbook of research on family business: 537-551. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • MAHéRAULT, L. 2000. The influence of going public an investment policy: An empirical study of French family-owned businesses. Family Business Review 13(1):71-79.
  • MATTHEWS, C. H.; VASUDEVAN, D. P.; BARTON, S. L., y APANA, R. 1994. Capital structure decision making in privately held fi rms: Beyond the fi nance paradigm. Family Business Review 7(4):349-367.
  • MCCONAUGHY, D.; MATTHEWS, C. H., y FIALKO, A. 2001. Founding family controlled fi rms: Performance, risk and value. Journal of Small Business Management 39(1):31-49.
  • MCMAHON, R. G. P., y STANGER, A. M. J. 1995. Understanding the small enterprise fi nancial objective function. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 19(4):21-39.
  • MILLER, D., y LE BRETON-MILLER, I. 2005. Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • MISHRA, C. S., y MCCONAUGHY, D. L. 1999. Founding family control and capital structure: The risk of loss of control and the aversion to debt. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 23(4):53-64.
  • MYERS, S. C. 1984. The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance 39(3):575-592.
  • MYERS, S. C., y MAJLUF, N. S. 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13(2):187-221.
  • NEUBAUER, F., y LANK, A. G. 1998. The family business-Its governance for sustainability. Londres: Macmillan Press.
  • NORTON, E. 1991. Factors affecting capital structure decisions. The Financial Review 26(3):431-446.
  • PEDERSEN, T., y THOMSEN, S. 2003. Ownership structure and value of the largest European fi rms: The importance of owner identity. Journal of Management and Governance 7(1):27-55.
  • PéREZ-GONZáLEZ, F. 2006. Inherited control and fi rm performance. American Economic Review 96(5):1559-1588.
  • POUTZIOURIS, P. 2001. The views of family companies on venture capital: Empirical evidence from the UK small to medium-size enterprising economy. Family Business Review 14(3):277-291.
  • ROMANO, C. A.; TANEWSKI, G. A., y SMYRNIOS, K. X. 2000. Capital structure decision making: A model for family business. Journal of Business Venturing 16(3):285-310.
  • SCHULZE, W.; LUBATKIN, M., y DINO, R. 2002. Altruism, agency, and the competitiveness of family firms. Managerial and Decision Economics 23(4/5):247-259.
  • SCHULZE, W.; LUBATKIN, M., y DINO, R. 2003. Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal 46(2):179-195.
  • SCOTT, W. R. 1981. Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • SHLEIFER, A., y VISNHY, R. W. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance 52(2):737-783. (Pubitemid 127344405)
  • SHYAM-SUNDER, L., y MYERS, S. C. 1999. Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics 51(2):219-244.
  • SIRMON, D. G., y HITT, M. A. 2003. Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family fi rms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 27(4):339-358.
  • SMITH, B. F., y AMOAKO-ADU, B. 1999. Management succession and fi nancial performance of family controlled fi rms. Journal of Corporate Finance 5:341-368.
  • VILLALONGA, B., y AMIT, R. 2006. How do family ownership, control and management affect fi rm value? Journal of Financial Economics 80(2):385-417.
  • WARD, J. L. 1987. Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profi tability, and family leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • WESTHEAD, P., y COWLING, M. 1998. Family firm research: The need for a methodological rethink. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 23(1):31-56.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet