A comparison of two modes of data collectionusing multidimensional analysis

Références bibliographiques

• Abascal, E. and I. Grande. 2005. Análisis de encuestas. Madrid: ESIC.
• Abascal, E., V. Díaz de Rada, N. García-Lautre and M. Landaluce. “Comparing face to face and telephone surveys in terms of sampling representativeness: a multidimensional analysis.” Quality & Quantity. International Journal of Methodology. junio 2010 DOI 10.1007/s 11135-010-9353-5.
• Alvira Martín, F. 2004. La encuesta: una perspectiva general metodológica. Cuadernos Metodológicos, nº 35. Madrid: CIS.
• Beck, F., S. Legleye and P. Peretti-Watel. 2004. “Using the telephone in general population surveys on drugs”. Pp. 113-140 in T. Decorte and D.J. Korf (Eds.), European studies on drugs and drug policy. Brussels: VUB Press.
• Benzécri J.P. 1979. “Sur le calcul des taux d´inertie dans l´analyse d´un questionnaire.” Les cahiers de l´Analyse des Donnés 4, nº 3: 377-366.
• Biemer, P.P. 2001. “Non-response bias and measurement bias in a comparison of face to face and telephone interviewing.” Journal of Official Statistics 17: 295-320.
• Blumberg, S.J., J.V. Luke, M.L. Cynamon and M. Frankel. 2008. “Recent trends in household telephone coverage in the United States.” Pp. 56-86 in J. Lepkowski et al. (eds). Advances in telephone survey methodologies. New York: Willey.
• Bowers, J. and M.J. Ensley. 2003. Issues in Analyzing Data from the Dual-Mode 2000 American National Election Study, NES Technical Report.
• Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas 2005. Preelectoral de Galicia. Elecciones autonómicas 2005, Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, research number 2608.
• Czaja, R. y J. Blair. 1996. Designing Surveys. California: Pine Forge.
• Day, N.A. et al. 1995. “Maximizing response to surveys in health-program evaluation at minimum-cost using multiple methods.” Evaluation Review 19: 436-450.
• De Leeuw, E. and J. Van der Zouwen. 1988. “Data quality in telephone and face to face surveys: a comparative meta-analysis”. Pp. 283-299. In R.M. Groves et al. (eds), Telephone Survey Methodology, New York: Wiley.
• De Leeuw, E. 2008. “Choosing the method of data collection”. Pp. 113-135, in E.D. de Leeuw; J.J. Hox y D.A. Dillman (eds.) International Handbook of Survey Methodology. Nueva York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates y Asociación Europea de Metodología.
• Dillman, D.A. 2008. “The logic and psychology of constructing questionnaires”. Pp. 171-175 in E.D. de Leeuw; J.J. Hox y D.A. Dillman (eds.). International Handbook of Survey Methodology. Nueva York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates y Asociación Europea de Metodología.
• Ellis, C. and Krosnick, J.A. 1999. Comparing telephone and face to face surveys in terms of sample representativeness: a Meta-Analysis of Demographics Characteristics. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan: NES (National Election Studies) Technical Reports. Retrieved March 1, 2005 from: www.umich.edu/nes/resources/papers/papers.htm.
• Galán, I., F. Rodríguez Artalejo and B. Zorrilla. 2004. “Comparación entre encuestas telefónicas y encuestas “cara a cara” domiciliarias en la estimación de hábitos de salud y prácticas preventivas.” Gaceta Sanitaria 18: 440-50.
• Goyder, J. 1985. “Face to face interviews and mailed questionnaires: the net difference in response rate.” Public Opinion Quarterly 49: 234-252.
• Green, M.C., J.A. Krosnick and A.L. Holbrook. 2001. “The survey response process in telephone and faceto-face surveys. Differences in respondent satisficing and social desirability response bias”. Retrieved June 23, 2004 from: www.umich.edu/nes/resources/techrpts/tech-abs/tech-ab62.htm.
• Grenacre M.J. and J. Blasius (eds) 2006. Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. London: Chapman & Hall / CRC.
• Groves, R.M. 1989. Survey Error and Survey Cost. New York: Wiley.
• Groves, R.M y R. Kahn. 1979. Surveys by Telephone. New York: Academic Press.
• Hox, J.J. and Deleeuw, E. 1994. “A comparison of non-response in mail, telephone, and face-to-face surveys.” Quality and Quantity 28: 329-344.
• Kalton, G. 2000. “Developments in survey research in the past 25 years.” Survey Methodology 26: 3-10.
• Krosnick, J.A. 1991. “Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 5: 213-236.
• Krosnick, J.A. 1999. “Survey research.” Annual Review of Psychology 50: 537-567.
• Kuusela, V., M. Callegaro and V. Vehovar. 2008. “The influence of mobile telephones on telephone surveys” Pp. 87-112 in J. Lepkowski et al. (eds). Advances in telephone survey methodologies. New York,Willey.
• Lavrakas, P.J. 1993. Telephone Survey Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, Applied Social Research Methdods Series, vol 7.
• Lebart L., A. Morineau and M. Piron. 1998. Statistique exploratoire multidimensionelle. París: Dunod
• Martínez de Luna, I. 2008. “Encuestas de opinión: de la teoría a la práctica.” Metodología de encuestas 10: 7–26.
• Massey, J.T. 1988. “An overview of telephone coverage” Pp. 3-8 in R.M. Groves et al. Telephone Survey Methodology. New York: Wiley
• Méndez Lago, M. and R. Martínez Casinello. 2007. Encuestas telefónicas vs. presenciales: análisis de la encuesta pre-electoral del CIS de las elecciones gallegas de 2005. 15th Seminar on Political and Sociological Surveys, organized by the Spanish Association for Opinion, Marketing and Market research studies (AEDEMO), Madrid, 15-16 November 2007.
• Nicolaas, G., K. Thomson and P. Lynn. 2000. The Feasibility of Conducting Electoral Surveys in the UK by telephone. London, National Centre for Social Research.
• Presser, S. and L. Stinson. 1998. “Data collection mode and social desirability bias in self-reported religious attendance.” American Sociological Review 63: 137-145.
• Salinas, J.M., A. Calvo and M.C. Aguilar. 2004. “Un análisis comparativo entre la entrevista telefónica y la entrevista presencial en la determinación de la prevalencia de los juegos de azar.” Metodología de Encuestas 6, nº 2: 119-132.
• Sykes, W. and M. Collins. 1998. “Effects of Mode of Interview: experiment in the UK” Pp. 283-299 in R.M. Groves et al. (eds), Telephone Survey Methodology, New York, Wiley.
• Tourangeau, R. 2004. “Survey research and societal change.” Annual Review of Psychology 55: 775-801.
• Voogt, R.J.J. and Saris, W.E. 2005. “Mixed mode designs: finding the balance between nonresponse bias and mode effects.” Journal of Official Statistics 21: 367-387.
• Wessell, D., W. Rahn and T. Rudolph. 2000. An analysis of the 1998 NES Mixed-Mode Design. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan: NES (National Election Studies) Technical Reports. Retrieved March 1, 2005 from: www.umich.edu/~nes/resources/papers/papers.htm.
• Willems, P. y P. Oosterveld. 2003. “The best of both worlds.” Marketing Research 25: 23-26.