Participação em uma comunidade virtual de prática desenhada como meio de diminuir a lacuna pesquisa-prática na educação em biologia

  1. Charbel Niño El-Hani
  2. Ileana María Greca
Revista:
Ciencia & Educação

ISSN: 1980-850X

Año de publicación: 2011

Volumen: 17

Número: 3

Páginas: 579-601

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1590/S1516-73132011000300005 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Ciencia & Educação

Resumen

This paper reports results related to the participation in a virtual community of practice (ComPratica) designed as a tool for bridging the research-practice gap. ComPratica gathers in-service high school teachers, preservice teachers, researchers, and graduate and undergraduate students, and include forums and chats about matters related to biological education. A central activity in the community is the construction of collaborative research, situated in real classroom conditions, involving teachers and researchers in non hierarchical teams. The initial success of the community is indicated by the high degree of participation, involving 25% of the members; the diversity of activities and themes within it; and the development of 8 research projects mostly focused on issues raised by the teachers. In this paper, we describe ComPratica and discuss data concerning the members' participation, the teachers' views about the community, and report findings of a thematic analysis of the messages sent in its forums.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ALLEN, T. H. F., HOEKSTRA, T. W.. (1992). Toward a unified ecology. Columbia University Press. New York.
  • BARAB, S. A., DUFFY, T. M.. (2000). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Erlbaum. Mahwah. 29-56
  • BARAB, S. A., BARNETT, M., SQUIRE, K.. (2002). Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: characterizing the essential tensions. Journal of the Learning Sciences. Mahwah. 11. 489-542
  • BEJARANO, N. R. R., CARVALHO, A. M. P.. (2003). Professor de ciências novato, suas crenças e conflitos. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências. Porto Alegre. 8. 257-280
  • BERO, L. A.. (1998). Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. British Medical Journal. London. 317. 465-468
  • BROEKKAMP, H., VAN HOUT-WOLTERS, B.. (2007). The gap between educational research and practice: a literature review, symposium and questionnaire. Educational Research and Evaluation. Abingdon. 13. 203-220
  • BROWN, S.. (2005). How can research inform ideas of good practice in teaching?: the contributions of some official initiatives in the UK. Cambridge Journal of Education. Cambridge. 35. 383-406
  • BROWN, J. S., DUGUID, P.. (2000). The social life of information. Harvard Business School Press. Cambridge.
  • DALGARNO, N., COLGAN, L.. (2007). Supporting novice elementary mathematics teachers' induction in professional communities and providing innovative forms of pedagogical content knowledge development through information and communication technology. Teaching and Teacher Education. New York. 23. 1051-1065
  • EL-HANI, C. N., GRECA, I. M.. Bridging the research-practice gap in science education with a virtual community of practice (ComPratica). Proceedings.... 14 IOSTE SYMPOSIUM. BledSlovenia. 2010.
  • GARCÍA GANDÍA, J., GRECA, I. M., MENESES VILLAGRÁ, J.. (2005). Las comunidades virtuales de práctica para el desarrollo profesional docente en Enseñanza de las Ciencias. Enseñanza de las Ciencias. Barcelona. 23. 1-5
  • GORDON, D. T.. (2003). Linking teachers with technology: online courses and communities provide ways of delivering professional development and support. Harvard Education Letter. Cambridge. 19. 1-4
  • GOULD, S., VRBA, E. S.. (1982). Exaptation - a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology. Washington. 8. 4-15
  • GRECA, I. M., GONZÁLEZ, E.. (2002). Comunidades de aprendizaje en desarrollo sustentable. Actas.... Universidad de La Laguna. La Laguna. 20 ENCUENTRO DE DIDÁCTICA DE LAS CIENCIAS EXPERIMENTALES. 2002.231-238
  • HARGREAVES, D. H.. (1999). The knowledge-creating school. British Journal of Educational Studies. Abingdon. 47. 122-144
  • HIEBERT, J., GALLIMORE, R., STIGLER, J. W.. (2002). A knowledge base for teaching profession: what would it look like and how can we get one?. Educational Researcher. Thousand Oaks. 31. 3-15
  • KENNEDY, M. M.. (1997). The connection between research and practice. Educational Researcher. Thousand Oaks. 26. 4-12
  • KIRK, J., MILLER, M. L.. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Sage. Newbury Park.
  • LAVE, J., WENGER, E.. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral practice. Cambridge University Press. New York.
  • LIEBERMAN, A.. (1996). Creating intentional learning communities. Educational Leadership. Sussex. 54. 5155
  • LÜDKE, M.. (2001). O professor e a pesquisa. Papirus. Campinas. 25-34
  • MCINTYRE, D.. (2005). Bridging the gap between research and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education. Cambridge. 35. 357-382
  • MIRETZKY, D.. (2007). A view of research from practice: voices of teachers. Theory into Practice. Philadelphia. 46. 272-280
  • MYERS, M. F.. (1993). Bridging the gap between research and practice: the Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters. Stillwater. 11. 41-54
  • NIELSEN, J.. (Oct.). Participation inequality: encouraging more users to contribute. Alertbox. Fremont.
  • PEKAREK, R., KROCKOVER, G., SHEPARDSON, D.. (1996). The research/practice gap in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Hoboken. 33. 111-113
  • PENA, F. L. A., RIBEIRO FILHO, A.. (2008). Relação entre a pesquisa em ensino de física e a prática docente: dificuldades assinaladas pela literatura nacional da área. Cadernos Brasileiros de Ensino de Física. Florianópolis. 25. 424-438
  • (2009). QUEM foi que disse?: Sobre a vida e o viver. UFF. Rio de Janeiro.
  • RÉNYI, J.. (1996). Teachers take charge of their learning: transforming professional development for student success [and] executive summary. National Foundation for the Improvement of Education. Washington.
  • SCHLAGER, M.S., FUSCO, J.. (2004). Designing virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 235-256
  • SCHLAGER, M. S., FUSCO, J., SCHANK, P.. (2002). Building virtual communities:: learning and change in cyberspace. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 129-158
  • SCHÖN, D.. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books. New York.
  • SCHOONMAKER, F.. (2007). One size doesn't fit all: reopening discussion of the research-practice connection. Theory into Practice. Philadelphia. 46. 264-271
  • SHORT, D. C.. (2006). Closing the gap between research and practice in HRD. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 17. 343-350
  • TOULMIN, S.. (2001). Regreso a la razón. Península. Barcelona.
  • VANDERLINDE, R., VAN BRAAK, J.. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal. Hoboken. 36. 299-316
  • WENGER, E.. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. New York.
  • WISKER, G., ROBINSON, G., SHACHAM, M.. (2007). Postgraduate research success: communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online communities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. Abingdon. 44. 301-320