El trabajo coeducativo y la igualdad de género desde la formación inicial en educación física

  1. Hortigüela Alcalá, David 1
  2. Alejandra Hernando Garijo 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Burgos
    info

    Universidad de Burgos

    Burgos, España

    ROR https://ror.org/049da5t36

Revista:
Contextos educativos: Revista de educación
  1. Goicoechea Gaona, María Ángeles (coord.)
  2. Fernández Guerrero, Olaya (coord.)

ISSN: 1575-023X

Ano de publicación: 2018

Título do exemplar: Género y Educación

Número: 21

Páxinas: 67-81

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.18172/CON.3292 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Contextos educativos: Revista de educación

Resumo

The objective of the study is to verify how a participatory approach in initial teacher training (ITT) of Physical Education (PE) helps students to value positively the use of strategies related to education and gender work. This is contrasted with the assessments that experts make about their use in the current educational situation. The research was carried out in the Faculty of Education of the University of Burgos. Fifty-one students participated in the Primary Education Degree and seven university teachers, from different universities, experts in the treatment of PE. A qualitative methodology has been used, being the groups of discussion with students and the interviews to teachers the instruments of data collection. The results show how after experiencing the practical contents of the subject, future teachers consider having discovered the area as an ideal tool for coeducational and gender work. Experts say that a reorientation in PE school is necessary for interpersonal relationships and cooperation. It concludes about the relevance of linking school practice with the ITT regarding co-education and gender work.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson-Nathe, B., Gringeri, C. y Wahab, S. (2013). Nurturing “Critical Hope” in Teaching Feminist Social Work Research. Journal of Social Work Education, 49(2), 277-291.
  • Bozkurt, E. y Tel, M. (2016). Opinions and Perceptions of Physical Education Students about Value Education. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(20), 1918-1924.
  • Breneselovic, D. P. y Krnjaja, Z. (2016). Discourses on Gender in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) Setting: Equally Discriminated Against. Journal of Pedagogy, 7(2), 51-77. http://doi.org/10.1515/jped-2016-0011.
  • Dervent, F. (2015). The Effect of Reflective Thinking on the Teaching Practices of Preservice Physical Education Teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 25(3), 260-275.
  • Chick, K. A. (2014). The Making of a Man: Rethinking and Challenging Stereotypes. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 50(4), 175-180. http://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2014.9 60341.
  • Choi, K. M. y Protivnak, J. J. (2016). Leaping into the Unknown: Experience of Counseling Students Participating in Group Work with International Students. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 41(3), 238-261. http://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2016.1197991.
  • Costigan, L. (2009). Assessing educational effectiveness: The focus group interview as a technique for data collection. Communication Education, 39(2), 117-127. http://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378794.
  • DeWall, N. (2016). Millennials by Heart: Memorization as an Active Learning Strategy for the “SparkNotes” Generation. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 27(4), 77-91.
  • Finco, M. D. et al. (2015). Exergaming as an Alternative for Students Unmotivated to Participate in Regular Physical Education Classes. International Journal of Game- Based Learning, 5(3), 10-15. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2015070101.
  • Hayden, L. et al. (2014). Integrating Physical Activity, Coach Collaboration, and Life Skill Development in Youth: School Counselors’ Perceptions. Journal of School Counseling, 12(23), 38-44.
  • Hortigüela, D., Fernández-Río, J. y Pérez-Pueyo, A. (2016a). Efectos del planteamiento docente en la enseñanza del fútbol sobre el clima de aula. Percepciones de alumnado y profesorado. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 16(1), 295-306.
  • Hortigüela, D., Fernández-Río, J. y Pérez-Pueyo, A. (2016b). Long-term effects of the pedagogical approach on the perceptions of physical education by students and teachers. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 16(4), 1326-1333. http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2016.04210.
  • Khasnabis, D. y Upton, K. (2013). Disrupting Traditions: Swimming against the Current of Adolescent Bullying. Voices from the Middle, 20(3), 37-46.
  • Kingdon, D., Serbin, L. A. y Stack, D. M. (2017). Understanding the Gender Gap in School Performance among Low-Income Children: A Developmental Trajectory Analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(2), 265-274. http://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416631836.
  • Kombe, D., Che, S., Carter, C. y Bridges, L. (2016). Student Academic Self-Concept and Perception of Classroom Environment in Single-Sex and Coeducational Middle Grades Mathematics Classes. School Science and Mathematics, 116(5), 265-275.
  • Landolfi, E. (2014). Teachers’ Understanding of Students’ Attitudes and Values toward Physical Activity in Physical Education Dropout Rates and Adolescent Obesity. Physical Educator, 71(3), 12-23.
  • Mills, M., McGregor, G., Baroutsis, A., Te Riele, K. y Hayes, D. (2016). Alternative Education and Social Justice: Considering Issues of Affective and Contributive Justice. Critical Studies in Education, 57(1), 100-115. http://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1087413.
  • Mistry, M. y Sood, K. (2016). Busting the Myth of Gender Bias: Views from Men and Women Primary-School Trainees and Teachers. Education, 3(13), 283-296. http://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2014.922595.
  • Parker, A., Bush, A. y Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2016). Understanding Teacher Candidates’ Engagement with Inquiry-Based Professional Development: A Continuum of Responses and Needs. New Educator, 12(3), 221-242. http://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2015.1027978.
  • Pérez-Pueyo, A., Hortigüela, D. y Hernando, A. (2014). La coevaluación intragrupal y el reparto de notas bajo un proceso de evaluación formativa. En P. Membiela, N. Casado y M.ª I. Cebreiros (Eds.), Experiencias e innovación docente en el contexto actual de la docencia universitaria (pp. 285-289). Ourense: Educación Editora.
  • Romano, N. C., Donovan, C., Chen, H. y Nunamaker, J. F. (2014). A Methodology for Analyzing Web-Based Qualitative Data. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 213-246.
  • Rosen, L. H., Scott, R. y DeOrnellas, K. (2017). Teachers’ Perceptions of Bullying: A Focus Group Approach. Journal of School Violence, 16(1), 119-139. http://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2015.1124340.
  • Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Singapore: Sage.
  • Strauss, A. y Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Colombia: Universidad de Antioquia.
  • Temel, C., y Güllü, M. (2016). Social Gender in the Pictures Drawn by Students about Physical Education Class. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(8), 530-536.
  • Thorleif, L. (2007). The Qualitative-Quantitative Distinction: Some comments. Journal Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(2), 115-132. http://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500048790.
  • Varga-Atkins, T., Mclsaac, J. y Willis, I. (2015). Focus Group meets Nominal Group Technique: an effective combination for student evaluation? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1(3), 1-12. http://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1058721.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet