Principios éticos en investigación educativa con PLE aplicados a una experiencia internacional

  1. Gil Mediavilla, Manuel
  2. Lezcano Barbero, Fernando
  3. Casado Muñoz, Raquel
Revista:
Edutec: Revista electrónica de tecnología educativa

ISSN: 1135-9250

Any de publicació: 2016

Número: 57

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.21556/EDUTEC.2016.57.747 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Edutec: Revista electrónica de tecnología educativa

Resum

Advances in the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in educational settings places us in contact with teachers and students that teach, learn and collaborate together using their Personal Learning Environments (PLE). In this context, ethical principles that can guide teaching and research-related processes are called for. Our work seeks to identify these principles and define measures for their appraisal, while likewise respecting fundamental values such as privacy, equality and collaboration. The method we follow is based on the review of expert contributions and their application in a research-action process, with on-line follow up, into the use of Personal Learning Environments for the improvement of digital and linguistic skills at an Italian educational centre. The results are the detection of possible improvements in the implementation of ethical principles and the excellent experience rating of the participants. It concludes with a summary of the proposed ethical practices that can be followed in future experiences.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Adell, J. & Castañeda, L. (2010). Los entornos personales de aprendizaje (PLEs): Una nueva manera de entender el aprendizaje. En R. Roig Vila & M. Fiorucci (Eds.). Claves para la investigación en innovación y calidad educativas. La integración de las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación y la Interculturalidad en las aulas. Alcoy & Roma: Marfil & Università degli Studi Roma Tre.
  • Albion, P. R. (2008). Web 2.0 in Teacher Education: Two Imperatives for Action. Computers in the Schools, Vol. 25, Issue 3-4, (Special Issue: A Special Issue on Web 2.0 in Education).
  • Álvarez-Valdivia, I. M. Y López-Benavides, D. (2010). Regulación del comportamiento durante la construcción conjunta de conocimientos en tareas cooperativas en entornos de aprendizaje virtuales asincrónicos y escritos. Cultura y Educación, 22(4), 419-438.
  • Anderson, T. & Kanuka, H. (2003). E-Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues. Boston, New York: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Area, M. (2005). Las tecnologías de la información y comunicación en el sistema escolar. Una revisión de las líneas de investigación. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 11(1). Recuperado de http://www.uv.es/RELIEVE/v11n1/RELIEVEv11n1_1.htm.
  • Asociación para el progreso de las comunicaciones (2006). Carta sobre Derechos en internet. APC. Recuperado de http://www.apc.org/es/pubs/about-apc/carta-de-apc-sobre-derechos-en-internet.
  • Bustamante, J. (2001). Hacia la cuarta generación de Derechos Humanos: repensando la condición humana en la sociedad tecnológica. CTS+I: Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología, Sociedad e Innovación, 1. Recuperado de http://www.oei.es/revistactsi/numero1/bustamante.htm.
  • Cabero, J. y Marín, V. (2011). Creación de un entorno personal para el aprendizaje: desarrollo de una experiencia. Edutec-e, Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 38. Recuperado de http://edutec.rediris.es/Revelec2/Revelec38/pdf/Edutec-e_38_Cabero_Marin_Infante.pdf.
  • Castells, M. (2008). La era de la información: economía, sociedad y cultura. Vol. 1, La sociedad red. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Clark R.C. y Mayer R.E. (2011). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Cheung, A.S.Y. (2009). Rethinking Public Privacy in the Internet Era: A Study of Virtual Persecution by the Internet Crowd. Journal of Media Law, 1 (2), 191-217.
  • Davies, J. y Merchant, G. (2009). Web 2.0 for schools. Learning and social participation. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
  • Dynamic coalition on internet rights and principles (2011). Carta de Derechos Humanos y Principios en Internet. Recuperado de http://diadeinternet.org/pdfs/Internet_Derechos_Principios.pdf.
  • Fiedler, S., & Pata, K. (2009). I Camp Educational Intervention Model. Innovative, inclusive, interactive & intercultural learning campus. Recuperado de http://www.icamp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/d13_icamp_final.pdf
  • Flórez Vivar, J.M. (2009). Nuevos modelos de comunicación, perfiles y tendencias en las redes sociales. Revista Comunicar, 33, 73-81.
  • Gelman R.B. (1997). Draft Proposal: Declaration of Human Rights in Cyberspace. Recuperado de http://www.be-in.com/10/rightsdec.html.
  • Greenhow, CH., Robelia, B. & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, Teaching, and Scholarship in a Digital Age Web 2.0 and Classroom Research: What Path Should We Take Now?. Educational Researcher, 38 (4), 246-259.
  • Hamelink, C.J. (2003). Human Rights for the Information Society. En B. Girard; S. Ó Siochrú, S. (Eds.). Communicating in the Information Society. Ginebra: UNRISD.
  • Hostetler, J. (2005). What is “good” education research?. Educational Researcher, 34 (6), 16-21.
  • Howe, K.N. & Moses, M.S. (1998). Ethics in Educational Research. Review of Research in Education, 24, 21-59.
  • Kanuka, H. & Anderson, A. (2008). Ethical issues in qualitative e-learning research International. Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(2), 20-39.
  • Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1988). Cómo planificar la investigación-acción. Barcelona: Laertes.
  • Kent, N. & Facer, K. (2004). Different worlds? A comparison of young people's home and school ICT use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(6), 440–455.
  • James, N. (2007). The use of email interviewing as a qualitative method of inquiry in educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 963-976.
  • James, N. & Busher, H. (2007). Ethical issues in online educational research: protecting privacy, establishing authenticity in email interviewing. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 30 (1), 101-113.
  • Mingers, J & Walsham, G. (2010). Toward ethical information systems: the contribution of discourse ethics. Journal MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 833-854.
  • Murphy, J., & Lebans, R. (2008). Unexpected outcomes: Web 2.0 in the secondary school classroom. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 134-147.
  • Nolen, A. L. & Putten, J. V. (2007). Action Research in Education: Addressing Gaps in Ethical Principles and Practices. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 401-407.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). Giving Knowledge for Free. The Emergence of Open Educational Resources: The Emergence of Open Educational Resources. París: OECD Publishing. Recuperado de https://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/givingknowledgeforfreetheemergenceofopeneducationalresources.htm.
  • Pelgrum, W.P. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37(2), 163–178.
  • Rather, M. (2002). Strategies for Teaching Internet Ethics. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 44, 73-79.
  • Ray, B.B. & Coulter, G.A. (2008). Reflective Practices Among Language Arts Teachers: The Use of Weblogs. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8 (1), 6-26.
  • Sánchez, C. (1997). Dilemas éticos de la investigación educativa. Revista de Educación, 312, 271-280.
  • Sharples, M., Graber, R., Harrison, C. & Logan, K. (2009). E-safety and Web 2.0 for children aged 11–16. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 70–84.
  • Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning (ITDL). Recuperado de http://er.dut.ac.za/handle/123456789/69.
  • Sikes, P. (2006). On dodgy ground? Problematics and ethics in educational research. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 29(1), 105-117.
  • Sloep, P. y Berlanga, A. (2011). Redes de aprendizaje, aprendizaje en red. Revista Comunicar, 37, 55-64
  • Tondeur, J., Van Keer, Van Braak, H. J. & Valcke, M. (2008). ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy. Computers & Education, 51(1), 212–223.
  • United Nations (1948). Declaración Universidad de los Derechos Humanos. United Nations General Assembly. Recuperado de http://www.un.org/es/documents/udhr/.
  • United Nations (2003a). Declaración de Principios Construir la Sociedad de la Información: un desafío global para el nuevo milenio. International Telecommunication Union, Ginebra. Recuperado de http://www.itu.int/wsis/docs/geneva/official/dop-es.html.
  • United Nations (2003b). Plan de acción de la Cumbre Mundial sobre la Sociedad de la Información. International Telecommunication Union, Ginebra. Recuperado de http://www.itu.int/wsis/docs/geneva/official/dop-es.html.
  • Unesco (2011). Transforming Education: The Power of ICT Policies. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  • Vallejo, J. et al. (2011). La reconversión educativa: Un largo, complicado y tortuoso camino hacia el cambio. Revista Escuela, 8, 6-8.
  • Wilson, S. et Al. (2007). Personal Learning Environments: Challenging the dominant design of educational systems. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 3(2), 27-38
  • Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., Y Byers, J. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations: Executive summary. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet