Creative researchers conflicts management

  1. Brito, Silvio Manuel 1
  2. Maldonado Briegas, Juan José 1
  3. Sánchez Iglesias, Ana Isabel
  1. 1 Universidad de Extremadura
    info

    Universidad de Extremadura

    Badajoz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0174shg90

Revista:
International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology: INFAD. Revista de Psicología

ISSN: 0214-9877

Año de publicación: 2019

Título del ejemplar: Posicionamientos Psicológico y Mundo Actual

Volumen: 1

Número: 1

Páginas: 49-58

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.17060/IJODAEP.2019.N1.V1.1384 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology: INFAD. Revista de Psicología

Resumen

Creativity is an attitude, human and dynamic, promoting change and development, both on an individual and social level. Although their procedure is individual, their work takes the collective form in a discontinued and instantaneous process, not harming the subjects in the concern of evaluating its impact. Their condition is the climate, the team environment, presupposes the training, the learning of methods, the continuous generation of ideas, questions that, assuming divergent and lateral thinking, necessarily induce the management of their conflicts. In this sense, we try to find, through a group of researchers and specialized coordinators, indications of such management in the teams they have oriented. In order to do this, we used two tests, one about creativity, and another about conflicts, and the statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS-Portuguese version), where we could see that conflict management in creative researchers is an evidence, due to the search for improvements in performance and in productivity, on the part of its members, and due to the absence of conflicts in the studied object.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Badke Schaub, P., Goldschmidt, G., & Meijer, M. (2010). How does cognitive conflict in design teams support the development of creative ideas? Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 119-133.
  • De Dreu, C. (2006). When Too Little or Too Much Hurts: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams. Journal of Management, Vol. 32 (1), February 2006, 83-107. doi: 10.1177/0149206305277795.
  • Dominguéz, E. (2013). Work stressors and creativity, M@n@gement, 4/2013 (16), p. 479-503. doi: 10.3917/mana.164.0479.
  • Farh, J.L., Farh, C.I.C., & Lee, C. (2010). Task Conflict and Team Creativity: A Question of How Much and When. Journal of Applied Psychology 2010, Vol. 95, (6), 1173–1180. doi: 10.1037/a0020015.
  • Fisher, K., & Fisher, M.D. (1998). The distributed mind. New York: AMACOM.
  • Freud, S. (1910a). A Special Type of Choice of Object made by Men (Contributions to the Psychology of Love I). The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XI.
  • Freud, S. (1924b). The Psychoanalytic Review (1913-1957); New York16 (Jan 1, 1929): 222.
  • Gardenswartz, L., & Rowe, A. (1994). Diverse teams at work: Capitalizing on the power of diversity. Chicago: Irwin.
  • Grau, J.B.; Sánchez – Garcia, Prizmic-Kuzmica, A.J., Vigil-Colet, A. (2014). Spanish adaptation of the Creative Potential and Practised Creativity scale (CPPC-17) in the workplace and inside the organization. Psicothema 2014, Vol. 26, No. 1, 55-62 doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.68.
  • Harter, S. (1986). Processes underlying the construction, maintenance, and enhancement of the self-concept in children. Psychological perspectives on the self, 3(13), 7-181.
  • Jackson, S.E. (Ed.) (1996). The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams. In M. West. Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 53-76). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Jesuíno, J.C. (1996). Processos de Liderança. Horizonte de Psicologia; 2.ª Ed. Livros Horizonte.
  • Kayser, T. A. (1994). Building team power: How to unleash on the collaborative genius of work teams. New York. Irwin.
  • Kayser, T.A. (1995). Mining group gold: How to cash in on the collaborative brainpower of a group. Chicago. Irwin Professional Publishing.
  • Mumford, Michael D.; Gustafson, Sigrid B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, Vol 103 (1), Jan 1988, 27-43. ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27.
  • Paulus, Paul B. (2000). Groups, Teams, and Creativity: The Creative Potential of Idea-generating Groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49 (2), 237-262.
  • Rank, O. (1932). Art and Artist: Creative Urge and Personality Development. Tudor Publishing Co.
  • Rosso, B.D. (2014). Creativity and Constraints: Exploring the Role of Constraints in the Creative Processes of Research and Development Teams. Organization Studies 2014, Vol. 35(4) 551–585.
  • Smith, G. J., Carlsson, I. M., & Danielsson, A. (1990). The Creative Process: A functional model based on empirical studies from early childhood up to middle age. Intl Universities Pr Inc.
  • Stasser, G. (Eds.) (1999). The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. L. Thompson, J. Levine, D. Messick., Shared Knowledge in organizations (pp.49-69). Mahweh, N.J.: Erlbaum
  • Stasser, G., Stewart, D.D., & Wittenbaum, G.M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 244-265.
  • Taylor, A; Greve, H.R. (2006). Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovation teams. Academy of Management Journal2006, Vol. 49, No. (4), 723–740.
  • Taylor, I. (Eds.) (1975). A retrospective view of creativity investigation. In Taylor & J. Getzels, Perspectives in creativity (pp. 6-39). Chicago: Aldine.
  • Turiel, E. (1974). Conflict and transition in adolescent moral development. Child development, 14-29.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet