¿Evaluamos realmente el aprendizaje en educación física?percepción de los profesores en diferentes etapas educativas

  1. Hortigüela-Alcalá, David
  2. González-Víllora, Sixto
  3. Hernando-Garijo, Alejandra
Revista:
Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación

ISSN: 1579-1726,  1988-2041

Año de publicación: 2021

Número: 42

Páginas: 643-654

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.47197/RETOS.V42I0.88686 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación

Resumen

Resumen. Antecedentes: La evaluación está relacionada con la forma en que los profesores abordan y entienden la educación física. Objetivo: Evaluar las percepciones de los profesores sobre la evaluación en diferentes etapas educativas. Método: Participaron siete profesores de educación física con experiencia en cada etapa educativa (Primaria, Secundaria y Universidad), y ocho estudiantes de Magisterio de Educación Física. Se siguió un diseño de investigación cualitativo. Resultados: Los profesores de Educación Primaria abogaban por una evaluación basada en el juego y la diversión, no considerando necesaria la participación de los alumnos en la misma. Los profesores de educación secundaria confundían la evaluación con la calificación, centrándose en las pruebas de aptitud física y deportiva y abogando por una aplicación exclusiva de la evaluación por parte del docente. Los profesores universitarios relacionaron la evaluación con el aprendizaje y destacaron la necesidad de ser transparentes en relación a su aplicación. Por último, los futuros profesores de educación física alentaron un cambio, considerando que la evaluación es un elemento complejo de la enseñanza y que el contexto en el que se aplique es determinante. Conclusión: La evaluación en la Educación Física se ve de forma diferente según la etapa, no existiendo elementos comunes en su puesta en práctica

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ada, E. N., Comoutos, N., Karamitrou, A., & Kazak, Z. (2019). Relationships between Dispositional Flow, Motivational Climate, and Self-Talk in Physical Education Classes. Physical Educator, 76, 357-384. https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2019-V76-I2-8419.
  • Bailey, R. (2009). The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: an academic review. Research Papers in Education, 24, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701809817.
  • Black, P. (2013). Pedagogy in theory and in practice: Formative and summative assessments in classrooms and in systems. In D., Corrigan, R., Gunstone, & A., Jones (eds.), Valuing Assessment in Science Education: Pedagogy, Curriculum, Policy.Springer, pp. 207-229.
  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom Assessment and Pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25, 551-575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807.
  • Bores-García, D., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., González-Calvo, G., & Barba-Martín, R.A. (2020). Peer Assessment in Physical Education: A Systematic Review of the Last Five Years. Sustainability, 12, 9233, 1-15. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12219233.
  • Bores-García, D., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Hernando-Garijo, A., & González-Calvo, G. (2021). Analysis of student motivation towards body expression through the use of formative and share assessment. Retos, 1(40), 198-208. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v1i40.83025.
  • Borghouts, L. B., Slingerland, M., & Haerens, L. (2017). Assessment quality and practices in secondary PE in the Netherlands. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22, 473-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2016.1241226.
  • Casey, A., & Larsson, H. (2018). “It's Groundhog Day": Foucault's Governmentality and Crisis Discourses in Physical Education. Quest, 70, 438-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2018.1451347.
  • Çakoyun, F. A. (2018). Analysis of self-esteem levels of students in physical education and sports high school. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6, 73-79. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i2.2951.
  • Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. OECD.
  • Chng, L. S., & Lund, J. (2018). Assessment for learning in physical education: The what, why and how. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 89, 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2018.1503119.
  • Chng, L. S., & Lund, J. (2019). The impact of formative assessment on the success and response rate in a 6th grade physical education badminton unit. International Journal of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 3, 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/24711616.2018.1509680.
  • Dauenhauer, B., Keating, X., Stoepker, P., & Knipe, R. (2019). State Physical Education Policy Changes from 2001 to 2016. Journal of School Health, 89, 485-493. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12757.
  • Dinan-Thompson, M., & Penney, D. (2015). Assessment literacy in primary physical education. European Physical Education Review, 21, 485-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X15584087
  • Fletcher, T., & Kosnik, C. (2016). Pre-service primary teachers negotiating physical education identities during the practicum. Education, 44, 556-565. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2016.1169486
  • González-Calvo, G., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., & Fernández- Balboa, J. M. (2020). Foci and factors that contribute to physical educators’ construction of their professional body subjectivities: a qualitative study. Sport, Education and Society, 25, 292-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2019.1578206.
  • Grajeda, T., Hushman, G., Krebs, M., & Hushman, C. J. (2019). Implementing proficiency-based learning and evidence-based grading in physical education. Strategies: A Journal for Physical and Sport Educators, 32, 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2019.1607638.
  • Hay, P. (2006). 3.8 Assessment for learning in physical education." In D., Kirk, D., Macdonald, & M., O´Sullivan (eds.), Handbook of Physical Education. Sage, pp. 312-325.
  • Hay, P., & Penney, D. (2009). Authentic assessment: A handbook for educators. Addison-Wesley.
  • Hay, P., & Penney, D. (2013). Assessment in physical education: A sociocultural perspective. Routledge.
  • Holt, N. L., Sehn, Z., Spence, J. C., Newton, A., & Ball, D. C. (2012). Physical education and sport programs at an inner city school: Exploring possibilities for positive youth development. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17, 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2010.548062.
  • Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Pérez-Pueyo, A., & Salicetti, A. (2015). ¿Cómo percibe el alumnado universitario de educación física la evaluación recibida? Contraste de dos metodologías diferentes. Retos. Nuevas tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 28, 66-70.
  • Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Pérez-Pueyo, A., & López-Pastor, V. (2015). Student involvement and management of students’ workload in formative assessment in higher education. Relieve: revista electrónica de investigación y evaluación educativa, 21(1), 1-5. doi: 10.7203/relieve.21.1.5171.
  • Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., & Pérez-Pueyo, A. (2016). La evaluación entre iguales como herramienta para la mejora de la práctica docente. Revista Opción, 32(7), 865-879.
  • Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Pérez-Pueyo, A., & Calderón, A. (2016). Efecto del modelo de enseñanza sobre el autoconcepto físico del alumnado en educación física. Retos. Nuevas tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 30,76-81.
  • Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Fernández-Río, J., Castejón, J., & Pérez-Pueyo, A. (2017). Formative assessment, work regulation, organization, engagement, tracking and attendance in Spanish Universities. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 20(3), 49-63. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/reifop.20.3.268681.
  • Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Palacios, A., & López-Pastor, V. (2019). The impact of formative and shared or coassessment on the acquisition of transversal competences in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 933-945. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1530341.
  • Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Pérez-Pueyo, A., & Fernández-Río, J. (2020). Evaluación formativa y modelos pedagógicos: modelo de responsabilidad y social y de autoconstrucción de materiales. Revista Española de Educación Física y Deportes, 430, 23-41.
  • Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Hernando-Garijo, A., & Pérez-Pueyo, A. (2021). Physical Education in the COVID-19. A tale from teachers of different educational stages. Retos, 41, 764-774. doi: https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v41i0.86368.
  • Larimer, A. (2016). Articulate bodies: The value of a somatic curriculum in a virtual world. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 87, 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2015.1131211.
  • Leirhaug, P. E., & Annerstedt, C. (2016). Assessing with new eyes? Assessment for learning in Norwegian physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21, 616-631. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1095871.
  • Leirhaug, P. E., & MacPhail, A. (2015). "It's the other assessment that is the key": Three Norwegian physical education teachers' engagement (or not) with assessment for learning. Sport, Education and Society, 20, 626-640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2014.975113.
  • Leirhaug, P. E., MacPhail, A., & Annerstedt, C. (2016). “The grade alone provides no learning": Investigating assessment literacy among Norwegian physical education teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 7, 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2016.1145429.
  • Le Roux, C. S. (2017). Exploring rigour in autoethnographic research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20, 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1140965.
  • López-Pastor, Víctor Manuel, Kirk, D., Lorente-Catalán, E., MacPhail, A., & Macdonald, D. (2013). Alternative assessment in physical education: A review of international literature. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2012.713860
  • Macken, S., MacPhail, A., & Calderon, A. (2020). Exploring primary pre-service teachers’ use of ‘assessment for learning’ while teaching primary physical education during school placement. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 25, 539-554.
  • https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1752647.
  • MacLean, J. (2018). Teachers as agents of change in curricular reform: The position of dance revisited. Sport, Education and Society, 23, 563-577. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2016.1249464.
  • MacPhail, A., & Halbert, J. (2010). “We had to do intelligent thinking during recent PE”: Students’ and teachers’ experiences of assessment for learning in post‐primary physical education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903565412.
  • MacPhail, A., & Murphy, F. (2017). Too much freedom and autonomy in the enactment of assessment? Assessment in physical education in Ireland. Irish Educational Studies, 36, 237-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2017.1327365.
  • McKenzie, E., Tapps, T., Fink, K., & Symonds, M. L. (2018). Challenge activities for the physical education classroom: Considerations. Strategies: A Journal for Physical and Sport Educators, 31, 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2017.1394238.
  • Moy, B., Renshaw, I., & Davids, K. (2015). The impact of nonlinear pedagogy on physical education teacher education students’ intrinsic motivation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21, 517-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1072506.
  • Ni Chróinin, D., & Caitriona, C. (2013). Implementing formative assessment in primary physical education: Teacher perspectives and experiences. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 18, 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.666787.
  • Ngozwana N. (2018). Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research methodology: Researcher's reflections. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4, 19-28.
  • Otero-Saborido, F., Vázquez-Ramos, F. J., Cenizo-Benjumea, J. M., & González-Jurado, J. A. (2020a). Analysis of the assessment in physical education curricula in primary education”. Sport, Education and Society (Published online), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1804349.
  • Otero-Saborido, F.M., Vázquez-Ramos, F. J., & González-Jurado, J. A. (2020b). Analysis of the assessment in Physical Education curricula in High School. Educacion XX1, 23(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.25662
  • Penney, D., Brooker, R., Hay, P., & Gillespie, L. (2009). Curriculum, pedagogy and assessment: three message systems of schooling and dimensions of quality physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 14, 421-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573320903217125.
  • Pérez-Pueyo, A., & Hortigüela. D. (2020). ¿Y si toda la innovación no es positiva en Educación Física? Reflexiones y consideraciones prácticas. Retos, 37, 639-647.
  • Redelius, K., & Hay, P. J. (2012). Student views on criterion-referenced assessment and grading in Swedish physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17, 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2010.548064.
  • Rink, J. (2014). Teacher effectiveness in physical education-consensus? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85, 282-286.https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2014.932656.
  • Rubel, D., & Okech, J. E. (2017). Qualitative research in group work: Status, synergies, and implementation. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 42, 54-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2016.1264522.
  • Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
  • Shelley, K., & McCuaig, L. (2018). Close encounters with critical pedagogy in socio-critically informed health education teacher education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23, 510-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1470615.
  • Sicilia-Camacho, A. (2003). La investigación sobre el pensamiento del alumnado: una revisión desde la Educación Física. Revista de Educación, 331, 577–613.
  • Stiggins, R. J. (2014). Improve assessment literacy outside of school too. Phi Delta Kappan, 96, 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721714553413.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2002). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. University of Antioquia.
  • Sundaresan, N., Dashoush, N., & Shangraw, R. (2017). Now that we’re “well rounded,” Let's commit to quality physical education assessment. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 88, 35-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2017.1356770.
  • Swaminathan, R., & Mulvihill, T. M. (2019). Learning to 'site-see': Place-reflexivity as a methodological tool for qualitative researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32, 982-997. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1635280.
  • Tsangaridou, T. (2008). Trainee primary teachers' beliefs and practices about physical education during student teaching. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 13, 131-152.https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980701345667.
  • Tolgfors, B. (2018). Different versions of assessment for learning in the subject of physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23, 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1429589.
  • Varolt, Y. K. (2016). The predictive power of the self-efficacy beliefs of physical education candidate teachers on their attitudes towards the assessment and assessment in education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4, 1458-1463. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040625.
  • Viciana, J., & Mayorga-Vega, D. (2017). Influencing factors on planning decision-making among Spanish in-service physical education teachers. A population-based study. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 15, 491-509. https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.43.16112.
  • Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.
  • Williams, S. M., & Weiss, W. (2018). Influence of significant others on high school students' expectancies of success and task value in physical education. Physical Educator, 75, 229-244. https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2018-V75-I2-8056.
  • Yildizer, G., Yılmaz, I., Solmaz, D. I., Şimşek, D., & Uçar, D. (2018). Attitudes of teacher candidates studying in physical education and alternative teacher certification programs towards teaching profession. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6, 2641-2646. https://doi.org/10. 13189/ujer.2018.061129.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet