Gemelos Digitales en la Industria de Procesos

Referencias bibliográficas

• Allgöwer, F., Badgwell, T.A., Qin, J.S., Rawlings, J.B., Wright, S.J. 1999. Nonlinear Predictive Control and Moving Horizon Estimation "" An In-troductory Overview BT. In: Frank, P.M. (Ed.), Advances in Control. Springer London, London, pp. 391-449. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-0853-5_19 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0853-5_19
• Arora, N., Biegler, L.T., 2001. Redescending estimators for data reconcilia-tion and parameter estimation. Comput. Chem. Eng. 25, 1585-1599. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(01)00721-9
• Aveva, 2020. Enabling the Digital Twin through Unified Engineering [WWW Document]. Blog. URL: https://www.aveva.com/en/perspectives/blog/enabling-the-digital-twin-through-unified-engineering/ (accedido 2.7.22).
• Bernardo, J. M., 2011. Modern Bayesian Inference: Foundations and Objec-tive Methods. In: Bandyopadhyay, P. S. et al. (Ed.) Handbook of the Phi-losophy of Science, Philosophy of Statistics, North-Holland, 7, pp 263-306. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-51862-0.50008-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51862-0.50008-3
• Birge, J. R., Louveaux, F., 2011. Introduction to stochastic Programming. Springer Verlag, Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0237-4
• Boss, B., Malakuti, S., Lin, S.W., Usländer, T., Clauer, E., Hoffmeister, M., Stojanovic, L., 2020. Digital Twin and Asset Administration Shell Con-cepts and Application in the Industrial Internet and Industrie 4.0. URL https://www.plattform-i40.de/IP/Navigation/EN/Home/home.html
• Bröcker, S., Benfer, R., Bortz, M., Engell, S., Knösche, C., Kröner, A., 2021. Process Simulation - Fit for the future? DECHEMA e.V.
• Darby, M. L., Nikolaou, M., Jones, J., Nicholson, D., 2011. RTO: An over-view and assessment of current practice. Journal of Process Control, 21, 874-884. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2011.03.009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2011.03.009
• de Prada, C., Sarabia, D., Gutierrez G., Gomez, E., Marmol, S., Sola, M., Pascual, C., Gonzalez, R., 2017. Integration of RTO and MPC in the hydrogen network of a petrol refinery. Processes, 5(3). DOI: 10.3390/pr5010003 https://doi.org/10.3390/pr5010003
• del Rio Chanona, E. A., Petsagkourakis, P., Bradford, E., Graciano, J. A., & Chachuat, B., 2021. Real-time optimization meets Bayesian optimization and derivative-free optimization: A tale of modifier adaptation. Computers & Chemical Eng., 147, 107249. DOI:0.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107249 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107249
• Engell, S., Harjunkoski, I., 2012. Optimal operation: Scheduling, advanced control and their integration. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 47, 121-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.06.039 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.06.039
• Fracaro, S. G., Glassey, J., Bernaerts, K., Wilk, M., 2022. Immersive technologies for the training of operators in the process industry: A Systematic Literature Review. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 107691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107691
• Galán, A.S., 2021. Simulation and optimization methods as decision support tools for operation of oil refinery hydrogen networks. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Valladolid. DOI: 10.35376/10324/46435 https://doi.org/10.35376/10324/46435
• Galan, A., de Prada, C., Gutierrez, G., Sarabia, D., Gonzalez, R., 2019. Predictive Simulation Applied to Refinery Hydrogen Networks for Oper-ators' Decision Support. IFAC"Papers On Line 52, 862-867. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.06.170 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.06.170
• Galan, A., de Prada, C., Gutierrez, G., Sarabia, D., Gonzalez, R., 2021, Real-time reconciled simulation as decision support tool for process operation. Journal of Process Control, 100, 41-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2021.02.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2021.02.003
• Ge, Z., Song, Z., Ding, S. X., Huang, B., 2017. Data mining and analytics in the process industry: The role of machine learning. IEEE Access, 5, 20590-20616. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2756872 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2756872
• Grieves, M., 2019. Virtually Intelligent Product Systems: Digital and physical twins. In: S. Flumerfelt, et al. (Ed.), Complex systems engineering: Theo-ry and Practice. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Ch. 7, pp. 175-200. DOI: 10.2514/5.9781624105654.0175.0200 https://doi.org/10.2514/5.9781624105654.0175.0200
• Jiang, S., Xu, Z., Kamran, M., Zinchik, S., Paheding, S., McDonald, A. G., Bar-Ziv, E., Zavala, V. M., 2021. Using ATR-FTIR spectra and convolu-tional neural networks for characterizing mixed plastic waste. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 155, 107547. DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107547 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107547
• KBC, 2021. Digitalization Manifesto. Now is the Time. URL https://www.kbc.global/uploads/files/whitepapers/KBC%20Digitalization%20Manifesto_US.pdf
• Lee, J. H., Shin, J., Realff, M. J., 2018. Machine learning: Overview of the recent progresses and implications for the process systems engineering field. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 114, 111-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.10.008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.10.008
• Linderoth, L., Wright, S., 2003. Decomposition Algorithms for Stochastic Programming on a Computational Grid. Computational Optimization and Applications, 24. 207-250. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021858008222 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021858008222
• Marchetti, A.G., François, G., Faulwasser, T., Bonvin, D., 2016. Modifier Adaptation for Real-Time Optimization-Methods and Applications. Pro-cesses, 4, 55. DOI: 10.3390/pr4040055 https://doi.org/10.3390/pr4040055
• Masooleh, L. S., Arbogast, J. E., Seider, W. D., Oktem, U., Soroush, M., 2022. Distributed state estimation in large-scale processes decomposed into observable subsystems using community detection. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 156, 107544. DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107544 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107544
• Mesbah, A., 2018. Stochastic model predictive control with active uncertain-ty learning: A survey on dual control. Annual Reviews in Control, 45, 107-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.11.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.11.001
• Microsoft Corporation, 2020. Azure Digital Twins. URL:https://azure.microsoft.com/es-es/services/digital-twins/#overview (accedido 2.7.22)
• Oh, T.H., Souza, L.F.S., Lee, J.M., 2021. Applying Digital Application Platform to Optimize Steam Methane Reforming Process, in: 2021 21st Inter. Conf. on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS). pp. 388-393. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICCAS52745.2021.9650053
• Oliveira-Silva, E., de Prada, C., Navia, D., 2021. Dynamic optimization integrating modifier adaptation using transient measurements. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 149, 107282. DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107282 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107282
• Palacín, C. G., Vilas, C., Alonso, A. A., Pitarch, J. L., de Prada, C., 2020. Closed-Loop Scheduling in a Canned Food Factory, 53-2, 10791-10796. In IFAC-PapersOnLine. 21st IFAC World Congress. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2863
• Pfeiffer, B.-M., Oppelt, M., Leingang, C., 2019. Evolution of a Digital Twin for a Steam Cracker, in: 2019 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA). pp. 467-474. DOI: 10.1109/ETFA.2019.8869449 https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2019.8869449
• Pitarch, J. L., Sala, A., de Prada, C., 2019. A systematic grey-box modeling methodology via data reconciliation and SOS constrained regression. Pro-cesses, 7(3), 170. DOI: 10.3390/pr7030170 https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7030170
• Qin, S., Jin, T., Van Lehn, R. C., Zavala, V. M., 2021. Predicting Critical Micelle Concentrations for Surfactants Using Graph Convolutional Neu-ral Networks. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 125(37), 10610-10620. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c05264 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c05264
• Reinbold, P. A., Kageorge, L. M., Schatz, M. F., Grigoriev, R. O., 2021. Robust learning from noisy, incomplete, high-dimensional experimental data via physically constrained symbolic regression. Nature communica-tions, 12(1), 1-8. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23479-0 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23479-0
• Sansana, J., Joswiak, M. N., Castillo, I., Wang, Z., Rendall, R., Chiang, L, H., Reis, M. S., 2021. Recent trends on hybrid modeling for Industry 4.0. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 151, 107365. DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107365 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107365
• Sarabia, D., de Prada, C., Gomez, E., Gutierrez, G, Cristea, S., Sola, J.M., Gonzalez, R., 2012. Data reconciliation and optimal management of hy-drogen networks in a petrol refinery. Control Engineering Practice, 20(4), 343-354. DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2011.06.009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2011.06.009
• Shafto, M.., Conory, M.., Dolye, R., Glaessgen, E., Kemp, C., LeMoigne J., Wang, L., 2010. DRAFT Modeling, Simulation, Information Technology & Processing Technology Area 11.
• Smallwood, R. D., Sondik, E. J., 1973. The optimal control of partially observable Markov processes over a finite horizon. Operations research, 21(5), 1071-1088. DOI: 10.1287/opre.21.5.1071 https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.21.5.1071
• Yokogawa, 2022. Digital Twin. URL: https://www.yokogawa.com/solutions/solutions/digitaltransformation/digital-twin/#Resources__White-Papers (accedido 2.7.22).