Sobre fairness y machine learning: el algoritmo, ¿puede (y debe) ser justo?

Referencias bibliográficas

• Anderson, Elizabeth S. (1999). What Is the Point of Equality? Ethics. International Journal of Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy, 109 (2), 287-337.
• Añón Roig, María José (2022). Desigualdades algorítmicas: conductas de alto riesgo para los derechos humanos. Derechos y Libertades, Época II, 47, 17-49.
• Barocas, Solow & Selbst, Andrew D. (2016). Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review 104 (3), 671-732.
• Barocas, Solow; Hardt, Moritz & Narayanan, Arvind (2018). Fairness and Machine Learning. Fairmlbook.org
• Bario Andrés, M. (ed.) (2019). Legal Tech. La transformación digital de la abogacía. Wolters Kluwer.
• Barry, Brian (1989). Theories of Justice. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
• Barry, Bryan (1995). Justice as Impartiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Bellver Capella, Vicente (2021). “Transhumanismo, discurso transgénero y digitalismo: ¿exigencias de justicia o efectos del espíritu de abstracción?, Persona y Derecho, vol. 84, pp. 17-53. https://revistas.unav.edu/index.php/persona-y-derecho/article/view/40651
• Binns, Reuben (2018). Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 149-159.
• Borges de Mazedo, U. (2001). A ética do futuro. En: A presença da moral na cultura brasileira. Ensaio de Ética e Historia das Idéias no Brasil, Londrina, UEL.
• Buchanan, Bruce G. & Headrick, Thomas E. (1970). Some Speculation about Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning, Stanford Law Review, 23 (1), 40-62.
• Campione, Roger (2021). La plausabilidad del Derecho en la era de la Inteligencia Artificial. Filosofía carbónica y filosofía silícica del derecho. Madrid: Dykinson.
• Carey, Alycia N. & Wu, Xintao (2022). The fairness field guide: perspectives from social and formal sciences, arXiv:2201.05216v2 [cs.AI] 8.
• Cárdenas Krenz, Ronald (2021). ¿Jueces robots? Inteligencia artificial y derecho / Judges robots? Artificial Intelligence and Law. Justicia & Derecho, 4, 1-10.
• Casadei, Thomas & Pietropaoli, Stefano (2021). Intelligenza artificiale: fine o confine del diritto? En: Cassadey, Thomas; Pietropaoli, Stefano (a cura di), Diritto e Tecnologie Informatiche (pp. 219-232). Milán: Wolters Kluwer.
• Caton, Simon & Haas, Christian (2020). Fairness in Machine Learning: a survey, arXiv preprint. arXiv:2010.04053, 1-33.
• Cohen, G.A. (2011). Fairness and Legitimacy in Justice, and: Does Option Luck ever Preserve Justice? En: On the Currency of Egalitalian Justice and Other Essays in Political Philosophy, edited by Michael Otsuka. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Courtland, Rachel (2018). Bias Detectives: The Researchers Striving to Make Algorithms Fair. Nature, 558, 357-360.
• Crawford, Kate (2021). Atlas of AI. Power, Politics and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence.
• Crenshaw, Kimberle (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color, Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
• Chouldechova, Alexandra (2016). Fair Prediction with Disparate Im pact: A Study of Bias in Recedivism Prediction Instruments, Big Data.
• Dastin, Jeffrey (2018). Amazon Scraps Secret AI Recruiting Tool that Showed Bias Against Women. Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/amazoncom-jobs-automation-idUSL2N1VB1FQ
• Dhasarathy, A.; Jain, S. & Khan, N. (2020). When Governments Turn to AI: Algorithms, Trade-Offs, and Trust. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-and-social-sector/our-insights/when-governments-turn-to-ai-algorithms-trade-offs-and-trust
• De Asís Roig, Rafael (2022). Derechos y tecnologías. Madrid: Dykinson.
• Dietvorst, Berkeley J.; Simmons, Joseph P. & Massey (2015). Cade. Alrithm Aversion: People Erroneously Avoid Algorithms after Seeing Them Err. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144 (1) 114-126- DOI: 10.1037/xge0000033
• Dignum, Virginia (2021). The Myth of Complete AI-Fairness, cs.CY, 1-6.
• Dwork, Cynthia; Hardt, Moritz; M., Pitassi, Toniann; Reingold, Omer & Zemel, Rich (2012). Fairness through Awareness. Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, 214-226.
• Dworkin, Ronald (2003). Virtud soberana: la teoría y la práctica de la igualdad. Barcelona: Paidós.
• Eubanks, Virginia (2021). La automatización de la desigualdad. Herramientas de tecnología avanzada para supervisar y castigar a los pobres, 2ª ed., trad. De Gemma Deza. Madrid: Capitan Swing.
• Ferguson, A.G. (2017). The Rise of Big Data Policing: Surveillance, Race, and the Future of Law Enforcement. New York University Press.
• Floridi, Luciano (2022). Etica dell’intelligenza artificiale Sviluppi, opportunità, sfide. Cortina Raffaelo.
• Friedler, Sorelle A.; Scheidegger, Carlos & Venkatasubramanian, Suresh (2016). On the (im)possibility of fairness. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.07236
• Goldman, Barry & Cropanzano, Russell (2015). “Justice” adn “Fairness” Are not the Same Thing, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 313-318. DOI: 10.1002/job.1956
• Hardt, Moritz; Price, Eric & Srebro, Nati (2016). Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. En: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
• Hobson, Zoë; Yesberg, Julia A.; Bradford, Ben & Jackson, Jonathan (2021). Artificial Fairness? Trust in Algorithmic Police Decision-Making, J Exp Criminol. 1-25.
• Huang, Wenxuan (2022). Reduce Model Unfairness with Maximal-Correlation-Based Fairness Optimization, Master Thesis. https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3A8f40561a-80be-4047-9760-63ab27207ffc
• Katz, Yarden (2017). Manufacturing an Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Neoliberalism and the “New” Big Data Yarden Katz. Harvard, Harvard University.
• Katz, Yarden (2020). Artificial Whiteness. Politics and Ideology in Artificial Intelligence. Columbia University Press.
• Kleinberg, Jon; Mullainathan, Sendhil & Raghavan, Manish (2017). Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores. Proceedings of Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS 2017). https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.05807
• Kleinberg, Jon; Ludwig, Jens; Mullainathan, Sendhill & Rambachan, Ashesh (2018). Advances in Big Data Research in Economics. Algorithmic Fairness. AEA PApers and Proceedings, 108, 22-27.
• Konstantinov, Nikola (2022). “Encontrar la equidad en IA” (entrevista realizada por Sandrine Ceurstemont (17 de mayo de 2022). https://topbigdata.es/encontrar-la-equidad-en-la-ai-noticias/
• Kraus, Rachel (2018). Amazon Used AI to Promote Diversity. Too Bad It’s Plagued with Gender Bias. Algorithms Reflect Societal Biases in More Ways Than One. October, 10, 2018. https://mashable.com/article/amazon-sexist-recruiting-algorithm-gender-bias-ai
• Kusner, Matt; Lofthus, Joshua; Russell, Chris & Silva, Ricardo (2017). Counterfactual Fairness, Neural Information Processing Systems. 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/file/a486cd07e4ac3d-270571622f4f316ec5-Paper.pdf
• Galeotti, Mattia (2018). Discriminaziones e algoritmi. Incontri e scontri tra diverse idee di fairness, The lab’s quaterly, XX (4) 73-96.
• Llano Alonso, Fernando Higinio (2018). Homo Excelsior. Los límites jurídicos del transhumanismo, Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
• Lledó Yagüe, Francisco (2022). Los nuevos esclavos digitales del siglo XXI y la superación del hombre óptimo. ¿Hacia un nuevo derecho robótico? Madrid: Dykinson.
• MacIntyre, Alasdair (1988) [2001]. Justicia y racionalidad: conceptos y contextos. Trad. De Alejo Jose G. Sison, Editorial Eiunsa.
• Martínez García, Jesús Ignacio (2020). La respuesta jurídica. Anuario de Filosofía del Derecho, 36, 347-371.
• Mehrabi, Ninnareh; Morstatter, Fred; Saxena, Nripsuta; Lerman, Kristina & Galstyan, Aram (2021). A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning, arXiv:1908.09635v3 [cs.LG] https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.09635
• Miller, David (2021). Justice. En: Edward N. Zalta (editor), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
• Nussbaum, Martha (2006). Weapons of Math Destruction. How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy, Penguin, New York, 2016 [trad. española (2018): Armas de destrucción matemática: cómo el big data aumenta la desigualdad y amenaza la democracia, trad. de Violeta Arranz de la Torre, Capitán Swing].
• Pérez-Luño, Antonio Enrique (1996). Manual de Informática y Derecho. Barcelona: Ariel.
• Rafanelli, Lucía M. (2022). Justice, Injustice, and Artificial Intelligence: Lessons from Political Theory and Philosophy, Big Data & Society, January-June: 1-5. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20539517221080676
• Rawls, John [1971] (2006). Teoría de la Justicia, trad. de María Dolores González, 6ª reimpresión.
• Rawls, John [2001] (2012). La justicia como equidad. Una reformulación, trad. Andrés de Francisco. Edición a cargo de Erin Kelly. Barcelona: Paidós/Estado y Sociedad.
• Santangelo, Antonio (2020). Equità degli algoritmi e democracia, DigitCult, 5(2), 21-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.53136/979125994120634
• Sandel, Michael (2009). Liberalismo y los límites de la justicia. Barcelona: Gedisa.
• Sandel, Michael (2018). Justicia. ¿Hacemos lo que debemos? Barcelona: Penguin Random House.
• Saxena, Nripsuta Ani; Huang, Karen; DeFilippis, Evan; Radanovic, Goran; Parkes, David C. & Liu, Yang (2019). How Do Fairness Definitions Fare? Examining Public Attitudes Towards Algorithmic Definitions of Fairness, pp. 1-8. https://econcs.seas.harvard.edu/files/econcs/files/saxena_ail19.pdf
• Scanlon, Thomas M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
• Scanlon, Thomas M. (2020). Why Does Inequality Matter? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Sen, Amartya (1980). Equality of What? En: McMurrin S. Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University poress.
• Solar Cayón, Jesús Ignacio (2019). La Inteligencia Artificial jurídica. El impacto de la innovación tecnológica en la práctica del Derecho y el mercado de servicios jurídicos, Cizur Menor (Navarra): Aranzadi.
• Soriano, Alba (2021). Decisiones automatizadas y discriminación: aproximación y propuestas generales, Revista General de Derecho Administrativo, 56, 1-45.
• Stewart, Matthew (2020). Cómo lograr la equidad en los algoritmos. https://www.codetd.com/es/article/12010244
• Tang, Zeyu; Zhang, Jiji & Zhang, Kun (2022). What-Is and How-To for Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey, Reflection, and Perspective, arXiv preprint. arXiv:2010.04053
• Verma, Sahil & Rubin, Julia (2018). Fairness Definitions Explaines, 2018. ACM/IEEE International Workshop on Software Fairness, 1-7.
• Walzer, Michael (2001). Las esferas de la justicia: una defensa al pluralismo y la igualdad. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2ª edición.
• Wang, Zhao (2021). Fairness-aware Multi-task and Meta-learning. Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the University of Texas at Dallas. Doctor of Philisophy in Computer Science.
• Wang, Zhao & Shu, Kai (2021). Enhancing Model Robustness and Fairness with Causality: A Regularization Approach. Conference: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Causal Inference and NLP, DOI: 10.18653/v1/2021.cinlp-1.3
• Xiang, Alice & Raji, Inioluwa Deborah (2019). On the Legal Compatibility of Fairness Definitions, arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.00761,1-6.
• Young, Iris Marion (2011). Responsibility for Justice, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Young, Iris Marion (2000). La justicia y la política de la diferencia. Trad. de Silvina Álvarez. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.
• Zafar, Muhammad Bilal; Valera, Isabel; Gómez Rodríguez, Manuel & Gummadi, Krishna P. (2017). Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact: Learning Classification Without Disparate Mistreatment. En Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web.