Percepción de alumnos y familias sobre la robótica educativa en la educación no formal

  1. David Llanos-Ruiz 1
  2. Vanesa Ausín-Villaverde 1
  3. Víctor Abella García 1
  1. 1 Facultad de Educación, Universidad de Burgo
Zeitschrift:
Education in the knowledge society (EKS)

ISSN: 2444-8729,  1138-9737

Datum der Publikation: 2023

Nummer: 24

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.14201/EKS.31351 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Education in the knowledge society (EKS)

Zusammenfassung

Robotics is an educational discipline based on a learning methodology that relies on areas of knowledge such as technology, physics, and mathematics and that, from implementing activities related to the creation, construction, and programming of robotic designs, facilitates the development of technical-scientific skills and competencies. The objective of the research is to know the perception of the students and their families about educational robotics as an efficient and motivating methodology during the formative development of the students. The methodology applied in the research is quantitative, being a retrospective and cohort study. Through the preparation of two ad-hoc questionnaires (families and students), information is collected through questions posed with the possibility of a Likert-type response (scale from 1 to 4), multiple answers and questions with semi-open answers. For this, the sample comprises 104 participants: 61 students who study robotics as a non-formal educational activity and 43 fathers and/or mothers. The perception of families reaffirms the virtues of educational robotics in the academic performance of students and in their professional and/or work future through the acquisition of technological and digital skills, together with the improvement and development of the ability to face problems. From the students, it is extracted that robotics is a relevant and motivating area in their training and developing their creativity and imagination.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Arabit-García J., & Prendes-Espinosa, M. P. (2020). Metodologías y Tecnologías para enseñar STEM en Educación Primaria: análisis de necesidades. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, (57), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2020.i57.04
  • Barrera Lombana, N. (2015). Uso de la robótica educativa como estrategia didáctica en el aula. Revista de investigación y Pedagogía Maestría en Educación, 6(11), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.19053/22160159.3582
  • Caballero-González, Y.A., & García-Valcárcel, A. (2020). ¿Aprender con robótica en Educación Primaria? Un medio de estimular el pensamiento computacional. Education in the Knowledge Society, 21, 15. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.22957
  • Cabello-Ochoa, S., & Carrera-Farran, F.X. (2017). Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para conocer las actitudes y creencias del profesorado de educación infantil y primaria sobre la introducción de la robótica educativa en el aula. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, (60), a362. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2017.60.871
  • Carrera-Farran, F. X., Vaquero-Tió, E., & Balsells-Bailón, M. A. (2011). Instrumento de evaluación de competencias digitales para adolescentes en riesgo social. EDUTEC: Revista Electrónica de Tecnologia Educativa, (35), a154. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2011.35.410
  • Casado-Fernández, R., & Checa-Romero, M. (2020). Robótica y Proyectos STEAM: Desarrollo de la creatividad en las aulas de Educación Primaria. Pixel-BIT Revista de Medios y Educación, (58), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.73672
  • Cavas, B., Kesercioglu, T., Holbrook, J., Rannikmae, M., Ozdogru, E., & Gokler, F. (2012). The effects of robotics club on the students’ performance on science process & scientific creativity skills and perceptions on robots, human and society. Third International Workshop teaching robotics, teaching with robotics integrating robotics in school curriculum. Riva del Garda, Italy. https://bit.ly/2OmGXQO Conde, M. Á., Rodríguez-Sedano, F. J., Fernández-Llamas, C., Gonçalves, J., Lima, J., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2021).
  • Fostering STEAM through challenge-based learning, robotics, and physical devices: A systematic mapping literature review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 46-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22354
  • del Álamo Venegas, J. J., Alonso Díaz, L., Yuste Tosina, R., & López Ramos, V. (2021). La dimensión educativa de la robótica: del desarrollo del pensamiento al pensamiento computacional en el aula. Campo Abierto, 20, 221-233. https://doi.org/10.17398/0213-9529.40.2.221
  • García-Valcárcel-Muñoz-Repiso, A., & Caballero-González, Y. (2019). Robotics to develop computational thinking in early Childhood Education. (Robótica para desarrollar el pensamiento computacional en Educación Infantil). Comunicar, 59, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.3916/C59-2019-06
  • Izcara Palacios, S. P. (2014). Capítulo 6. La estrategia metodológica. Manual de Investigación Cualitativa (pp. 42-49). Editorial Fontamara S.A.
  • Jonassen, D. (2008). Instructional design as design problem solving: An iterative process. Educational Technology, 48(3), 21-26.
  • Kucuk, S., & Sisman, B. (2020). Students’ attitudes towards robotics and STEM: Differences based on gender and robotics experience. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 23, 100167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100167
  • Master, A., Cheryan, S., Moscatelli, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2017). Programming experience promotes higher STEM motivation among first-grade girls. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 160, 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.013
  • Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage Publications.
  • Puig, N. & Bargalló, C. (2017). Aprendizaje de las ciencias basado en proyectos: del contexto a la acción. Ápice. Revista de Educación Científica, 18(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.17979/arec.2017.1.1.2020
  • Rivadeneira, P. (2019). La robótica como una herramienta para facilitar el aprendizaje y desarrollo de las competencias STEM en los integrantes del equipo de robótica Pólux de la Institución Educativa Juan Nepomuceno Cadavid (Tesis de Maestría). http://hdl.handle.net/10784/12087
  • Salas-Lòpez, G., Sandoval-González, O., Herrera-Aguilar, I., Martínez-Sibaja, A., Portillo-Rodríguez, O., & VilchisGonzález, A. (2012). Design and development of a planar robot for upper extremities rehabilitation with visuo-vibrotactile feedback. Procedia Technology, 3, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.03.016
  • So, S., & Lee, N. (2023). Pedagogical exploration and technological development of a humanoid robotic system for teaching to and learning in young children. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2179181. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2179181
  • Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2013). Gender differences in kindergarteners’ robotics and programming achievement. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9210-z
  • Varney, M. W., Janoudi, A., Aslam, D. M., & Graham, D. (2012). Building Young Engineers: TASEM for Third Graders in Woodcreek Magnet Elementary School. IEEE Transactions on Education, 55(1), 78-82. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2011.2131143
  • Vigotsky, L. (1990). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Soviet Psychology, 28(1), 84-96. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405280184
  • Xie, Y., Fang, M., & Shauman, K. (2015). STEM Education. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 331-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145659
  • Yousif, M. J., & Yousif, J. H. (2020). Humanoid Robot as Assistant Tutor for Autistic Children. International Journal of Computation and Applied Sciences, 8(2).
  • Zambrano-Mendoza, G. K., & Vigueras-Moreno, J. A. (2020). Rol familiar en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Domino de las Ciencias, 6(3), Art. 3.
  • Zawieska, K., & Duffy, B. R. (2015). The Social Construction of Creativity in Educational Robotics. In R. Szewczyk, C. Zieliński, & M. Kaliczyńska (Eds.), Progress in Automation, Robotics and Measuring Techniques (pp. 329-338). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15847-1_32
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet