The IndagApp mobile appan inquiry-based science teaching resource: usability evaluation with pre-service teachers

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments,0(0), 1–13. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 10494 820. 2020. 18131 80
• Aditomo, A., & Klieme, E. (2020). Forms of inquiry-based science instruction and their relations with learning outcomes: Evidence from high and low-performing education systems. International Journal of Science Education,42(4), 504–525. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 09500 693. 2020. 17160 93
• Aguilera, D., Martin-Paez, T., Valdivia-Rodriguez, V., Ruiz-Delgado, A., Williams-Pinto, L., Vilchez-Gonzalez, J. M., & Perales- Palacios, F. J. (2018). La ensenanza de las ciencias basada en indagacion. Una revision sistematica de la produccion espanola. Revista De Educacion,381, 259–284. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2017-381-388
• Aguilera, D., & Perales-Palacios, F. J. (2020). What effects do didactic interventions have on students’ attitudes towards science? A meta-analysis. Research in Science Education,50(2), 573–597. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11165-018-9702-2
• Ali, N., Ullah, S., & Khan, D. (2022). Interactive laboratories for science education: A subjective study and systematic literature review. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction,6(10). https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ mti61 00085
• Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean; adding an adjective rating. Journal of Usability Studies,4(3), 114–123.
• Baroudi, S., & Helder, M. R. (2019). Behind the scenes: Teachers’ perspectives on factors affecting the implementation of inquiry-based science instruction. Research in Science and Technological Education, 1–22. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 02635 143. 2019. 16512 59
• Brooke, J. (1996). A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 207–212). Taylor & Francis.
• Brooke, J. (2013). SUS: A retrospective. Journal of Usability Studies,8(2), 29–40.
• Canal, P., Criado, A. M., Garcia-Carmona, A., & Munoz-Franco, G. (2016). Concepciones didacticas y practica docente [Didactic conceptions and teaching practice]. In P. Canal, G. Trave Gonzalez, F. J. Pozuelos Estrada, A. M. Criado, & A. Garcia-Carmona (Eds.), La enseñanza sobre el medio natural y social. Investigaciones y experiencias [Teaching about the natural and social environment. Research and experiences]. (pp. 177–205). Diada.
• Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020). COVID-19 and teacher education: A literature review of online teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education,43(4), 466–487. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 02619 768. 2020. 18211 84
• Chichekian, T., Shore, B. M., & Tabatabai, D. (2016). First-year teachers’ uphill struggle to implement inquiry instruction: Exploring the interplay among self-efficacy, conceptualizations, and classroom observations of inquiry enactment. SAGE Open, 6(2). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 21582 44016 649011
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th edition). Routledge.
• Correia, A. P., Koehler, N., Thompson, A., & Phye, G. (2019). The application of PhET simulation to teach gas behavior on the submicroscopic level: Secondary school students’ perceptions. Research in Science and Technological Education,37(2), 193–217. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 02635 143. 2018. 14878 34
• Correia, C. F., & Harrison, C. (2019). Teachers’ beliefs about inquiry-based learning and its impact on formative assessment practice. Research in Science and Technological Education,00(00), 1–22. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 02635 143. 2019. 16340 40
• Crawford, B. A. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 515–541). Routledge.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd edition). Sage.
• de Jong, T., Gillet, D., Rodriguez-Triana, M. J., Hovardas, T., Dikke, D., Doran, R., Dziabenko, O., Koslowsky, J., Korventausta, M., Law, E., Pedaste, M., Tasiopoulou, E., Vidal, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2021). Understanding teacher design practices for digital inquiry–based science learning: The case of Go-Lab. Educational Technology Research and Development,69(2), 417–444. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11423-020-09904-z
• de Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Chinn, C. A., Fischer, F., Gobert, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Koedinger, K. R., Krajcik, J. S., Kyza, E. A., Linn, M. C., Pedaste, M., Scheiter, K., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2023). Let’s talk evidence – The case for combining inquirybased and direct instruction. Educational Research Review,39(November 2022), 100536. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. edurev. 2023. 100536
• Del Rocio Sevilla-Gonzalez, M., Loaeza, L. M., Lazaro-Carrera, L. S., Ramirez, B. B., Rodriguez, A. V., Peralta-Pedrero, M. L., & Almeda-Valdes, P. (2020). Spanish version of the system usability scale for the assessment of electronic tools: Development and validation. JMIR Human Factors,7(4), 1–7. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 21161 Emden, M. (2021). Reintroducing “the” scientific method to introduce scientific inquiry in schools?: A cautioning plea not to throw out the baby with the bathwater. SCience and Education,30(5), 1037–1073. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11191-021-00235-w
• Fang, S. C. (2020). Towards scientific inquiry in secondary earth science classrooms: Opportunities and realities. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10763-020-10086-6
• Garcia-Carmona, A., Criado, A. M., & Cruz-Guzman, M. (2018). Prospective primary teachers’ prior experiences, conceptions, and pedagogical valuations of experimental activities in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,16(2), 237–253. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10763-016-9773-3
• Hurtado-Bermudez, S., & Romero-Abrio, A. (2023). The effects of combining virtual laboratory and advanced technology research laboratory on university students’ conceptual understanding of electron microscopy. Interactive Learning Environments,31(2), 1126–1141. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 10494 820. 2020. 18217 16
• Kolil, V. K., & Achuthan, K. (2022). Longitudinal study of teacher acceptance of mobile virtual labs. Education and Information Technologies, 1–34. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10639-022-11499-2
• Lestari, D. P., Supahar, Paidi, Suwarjo, & Herianto. (2023). Effect of science virtual laboratory combination with demonstration methods on lower-secondary school students’ scientific literacy ability in a science course. Education and Information Technologies, 0123456789. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10639-023-11857-8
• Lewis, J. R. (2014). Usability: Lessons learned. and yet to be learned. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(9), 663–684. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 10447 318. 2014. 930311
• Lewis, J. R. (2018). The system usability scale: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(7), 577–590. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 10447 318. 2018. 14553 07
• LOMLOE. (2020). Ley Orgánica 3/2020, de 29 de diciembre, por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 340, de 30 de diciembre de 2020 [Organic Law 3/2020, of December 29, 2020, which amends Organic Law 2/2006, of May 3, 2006, on Education. Official State Bulletin, 340, of December 30, 2020]. https:// www. boe. es/ boe/ dias/ 2020/ 12/ 30/ pdfs/ BOE-A-2020-17264. pdf
• Lowdermilk, T. (2013). User-centered design: A developer’s guide to building user-friendly applications. O’Reilly.
• Lu, J., Schmidt, M., Lee, M., & Huang, R. (2022). Usability research in educational technology: a state-of-the-art systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70, 1951-1992. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11423-022-10152-6
• Manyilizu, M. C. (2022). Effectiveness of virtual laboratory vs. paper-based experiences to the hands-on chemistry practical in Tanzanian secondary schools. Education and Information Technologies,28(5), 4831–4848. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10639-022-11327-7
• MINEDUC. (2012). Bases curriculares. Educación Básica [Curricular bases. Basic Education]. https:// archi vos. agenc iaedu cacion. cl/ bibli oteca_ digit al_ histo rica/ orien tacion/ 2012/ bases_ curri cular esbas ica_ 2012. pdf
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). The Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. endm. 2015. 07. 014
• Osborne, J. (2014). Scientific practices and inquiry in the science classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 579–599)
• Pedaste, M., Maeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review,14, 47–61. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. edurev. 2015. 02. 003
• Radhamani, R., Kumar, D., Nizar, N., Achuthan, K., Nair, B., & Diwakar, S. (2021). What virtual laboratory usage tells us about laboratory skill education pre- and post-COVID-19: Focus on usage, behavior, intention and adoption. Education and Information Technologies,26(6), 7477–7495. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10639-021-10583-3
• Raman, R., Achuthan, K., Nair, V. K., & Nedungadi, P. (2022). Virtual Laboratories- A historical review and bibliometric analysis of the past three decades. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 11055–11087. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10639-022-11058-9
• Real Decreto 157/2022, de 1 de marzo, por el que se establecen la ordenacion y las ensenanzas minimas de la Educacion Primaria [Royal Decree 157/2022, of March 1, establishing the organization and minimum teaching requirements for Primary Education]. https:// www. boe. es/ eli/ es/ rd/ 2022/ 03/ 01/ 157/ con
• Roll, I., Butler, D., Yee, N., Welsh, A., Perez, S., Briseno, A., Perkins, K., & Bonn, D. (2018). Understanding the impact of guiding inquiry: The relationship between directive support, student attributes, and transfer of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours in inquiry learning. Instructional Science,46(1), 77–104. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11251-017-9437-x
• Romero-Ariza, M., Quesada, A., Abril, A. M., Sorensen, P., & Oliver, M. C. (2019). Highly recommended and poorly used: English and Spanish science teachers’ views of Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) and its enactment. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education.,16(1), 1–16. https:// doi. org/ 10. 29333/ ejmste/ 109658
• Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2016). Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Morgan Kaufmann.
• Scalise, K., Timms, M., Moorjani, A., Clark, L., Holtermann, K., & Irvin, P. S. (2011). Student learning in science simulations: Design features that promote learning gains. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,48(9), 1050–1078. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ tea. 20437
• Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, J. S., & Enderle, P. J. (2023). Scientific inquiry literacy: The missing link on the continuum from science literacy to scientific literacy. In N. G. Lederman, D. L. Zeidler, & J. S. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (Vol. III, pp. 749–782). Routledge.
• Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education,34(9), 1337–1370. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 09500 693. 2011. 605182
• Strat, T. T. S., Henriksen, E. K., & Jegstad, K. M. (2023). Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education,00(00), 1–59. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 03057 267. 2023. 22071 48
• Sundararajan, N. K., & Adesope, O. (2020). Keep it coherent: A meta-analysis of the seductive details effect. Educational Psychology Review,32(3), 707–734. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10648-020-09522-4
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Toma, R. B. (2021a). Evidencias de validez de una medida de la motivacion por las ciencias de la naturaleza [Validity evidence for a measure of motivation for science]. Educación XX1, 24(2), 351–374. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5944/ educX X1. 28244
• Toma, R. B. (2021b). Measuring children’s perceived cost of school science: Instrument development and psychometric evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101009. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. stued uc. 2021. 101009 Toma, R. B. (2022a). Confirmation and structured inquiry teaching: Does it improve students’ achievement motivations in school science? Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(1), 28–41. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s42330-022-00197-3
• Toma, R. B. (2022b). Effect of confirmation and structured inquiry on attitudes toward school science. School Science and Mathematics, 122(1), 16–23. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ ssm. 12505
• van der Graaf, J., Segers, E., & de Jong, T. (2020). Fostering integration of informational texts and virtual labs during inquiry-based learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology,62(June), 101890. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cedps ych. 2020. 101890
• Vlachogianni, P., & Tselios, N. (2022). Perceived usability evaluation of educational technology using the System Usability Scale (SUS): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,54(3), 392–409. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 15391 523. 2020. 18679 38
• Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008). PhET: Simulations that enhance learning. Science,322(5902), 682–683. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. 11619 48
• Yanez-Perez, I., Toma, R. B., Meneses-Villagra, J. A. (in press a). La brecha digital en la ensenanza de las ciencias en Espana durante las leyes educativas LOE y LOMCE [The digital gap in science education in Spain during the LOE and LOMCE educational laws]. Revista Tecnología, Ciencia y Educación
• Yanez-Perez, I., Toma, R. B., Meneses-Villagra, J. A. (in press b). Diseno y usabilidad de IndagApp: una app para la ensenanza de las ciencias por indagacion [Design and usability of IndagApp: An app for inquiry-based Science Education]. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia
• Yaron, D., Karabinos, M., Lange, D., Greeno, J. G., & Leinhardt, G. (2010). The ChemCollective - virtual labs for introductory chemistry courses. Science,328(5978), 584–585. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. 11824 35
• Zacharia, Z. C., Manoli, C., Xenofontos, N., de Jong, T., Pedaste, M., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Maeots, M., Siiman, L., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Identifying potential types of guidance for supporting student inquiry when using virtual and remote labs in science: A literature review. Educational Technology Research and Development,63(2), 257–302. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11423-015-9370-0
• Zhang, L. (2018). Withholding answers during hands-on scientific investigations? Comparing effects on developing students’ scientific knowledge, reasoning, and application. International Journal of Science Education,40(4), 459–469. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 09500 693. 2018. 14296 92