Party-voter linkagesa Comparative View of Ideology and European Integration

Referencias bibliográficas

• Achen, Christopher H. (1977). Measuring Representation: Perils of the Correlation Coefficient. American Journal of Political Science, XXI (4): 805-815.
• Achen, Christopher H. (1978). Measuring Representation. American Journal of Political Science, XXII (3): 475-510.
• Adams, James et al. (2006). Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties Policy Shifts, 1976-1998. American Journal of Political Science, 50 (3): 513-529.
• American Political Science Association (1950). Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System. Washington: American Political Science Association.
• Barnes, Samuel (1977). Representation in Italy: Institutionalized Tradition and Electoral Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Belchior, Ana Mara (2010). Ideological Congruence among European Political Parties. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16(1): 121-142.
• Benoit, Kenneth and Laver, Michael (2006). Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
• Blais, Andr and Bodet, Marc Andr (2006). Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence between Citizens and Policymakers?. Comparative Political Studies, 39: 1243-1263.
• Converse, Philip and Pierce, Roy (1986). Political Representation in France. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
• Dalton, Russell J. (1985). Political Parties and Political Representation: Party Supporters and PartyElites in Nine Nations. Comparative Political Studies, 18: 267-299.
• Dalton, Russell J. Farrell, David M. and McAllister, Ian (2011). Political Parties and Democratic Linkage, How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• De Vries, Catherine E. (2010). EU Issue Voting. Asset or Liability? How European Integration Affects Parties Electoral Fortunes. European Union Politics, 11(1): 89-117.
• De Vries, Catherine E. and Marks, Gary (2012). The Struggle over Dimensionality: A Note on Theory and Empirics. European Union Politics, 13(2): 185-193.
• De Vries, Catherine E. and Tillman, Erik R. (2011). European Union Issue Voting in East and West Europe: The Role of Political Context. Comparative European Politics, 9(1): 1-17.
• De Vries, Catherine E. and Edwards, Erica E. (2009). Taking Europe to Its Extremes: Extremist Parties and Public Euroscepticism. Party Politics, 15(1): 5-28.
• Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
• Ezrow, Lawrence (2010). Linking Citizens and Parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Gabel, Matthew (1998). Interest and Integration Market Liberalization, Public Opinion and European Union. Ann Arbor: The University Press.
• Gabel, Matthew and Huber, John D. (2000). Putting Parties in their Place: Inferring Party Left-right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data. American Journal of Political Science, 44 (1): 94-103.
• Golder, Matt and Stramski, Jacek (2010). Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 54: 90-106.
• Gmez-Reino, Margarita and Llamazares, Ivn (2013). The Populist Radical Right and European Integration: A Comparative Analysis of Party-Voters Links. West European Politics [DOI:10.1080/01 402382.2013.783354].
• Herrera, Cheryl Lyn; Herrera, Richard and Smith, Eric (1992). Public Opinion and Congressional Representation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56: 185-205.
• Hix, Simon and Lord, Christopher (1997). Political Parties in the European Union. London: Macmillan.
• Hix, Simon and Lord, Christopher and Marsh, Michael (2007). Punishment or Protest? Understanding European Parliament Elections. The Journal of Politics, 69(2): 495-510.
• Hooghe, Liesbet (2003). Europe Divided? Elites vs. Public Opinion on European Integration. European Union Politics, 4(3): 281-305.
• Hooghe, Liesbet and (2009). A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1): 1-23.
• Hooghe, Liesbet (2004). Does Identity or Economic Rationality Drive Public Opinion on European Integration?. Political Science and Politics, 3: 415-420.
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Wilson, Carol (2002). Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?. Comparative Political Studies, 35(8): 965-989.
• Huber, John and Powell, G. Bingham (1994). Congruence between Citizens and Policymakers in Two Visions of Liberal Democracy. World Politics, 46: 291-326.
• King, Gary et al. (2004). Enhancing the Validity and Cross-Cultural Comparability of Measurement in Survey Research. American Political Science Review, 98: 191-207.
• Kitschelt, Herbert (1994). The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kriesi, Hanspeter et al. (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lachat, Romain (2008). The Electoral Consequences of the Integration-Demarcation Cleavage. In: Kriesi, H. et al. (eds.). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Luna, Juan Pablo and Zechmeister, Elizabeth (2005). Representation in Latin America: A Study of Elite-Mass Congruence in Nine Countries. Comparative Political Studies, 38(4): 388-416.
• Marks, Gary; Hooghe, Liesbet; Nelso, Moira and Edwards, Erica (2006). Party Competition and European Integration in East and West: Different Structure, Same Causality. Comparative Political Studies, 39(2): 155-175.
• Marks, Gary; Hooghe, Liesbet; Nelso, Moira and Edwards, Erica Steenbergen, Marco R. (eds.) (2004). European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Mattila, Mikko and Raunio, Tapio (2006). Cautious Voters-Supportive Parties. Opinion Congruence between Voters and Parties on the EU Dimension. European Union Politics, 7(4): 427-449.
• Meguid, Bonnie M. (2007). Party Competition between Unequals. Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald (1963). Constituency Influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57: 45-56.
• Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald et al. (1999). Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Otero Felipe, Patricia (2011). Congruencia ideologica e Integracion Europea. Un analisis de los vinculos entre votantes y partidos en Europa. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Salamanca, Espaa.
• Otero Felipe, Patricia, Rodrguez Zepeda, Juan Antonio (2010). Measuring Political Representation in Latin America: A Study of the Ideological Congruence between Parties and Voters. Conferencia Anual American Political Science Association (APSA). Washington, 1-4 de septiembre. [on line: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=1642532]
• Pitkin, Hanna (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Powell, G. Bingham (2009). The Ideological Congruence Controversy: The Impact of Alternative Measures. Data and Time Periods on the Effects of Election Rules. Comparative Political Studies, 42: 1475-1497.
• Reif, Karlheinz and Schmitt, Hermann (1980). Nine Second-Order National Elections. A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results. European Journal of Political Research, 8: 3-44.
• Sani, Giacomo and Sartori, Giovanni (1983). Polarization, Fragmentation and Competition in Western Democracies. In: Daalder, H. and Mair, P. (eds.). Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change. London: Sage.
• Schmitt, Hermann and Thomassen, Jacques (2000). Dynamic Representation. The Case of the European Integration. European Union Politics, 1(3): 318-339.
• Steenbergen, Marco; Ewards, Erica; Netjes, Catherine E. (2007). Whos Cueing Whom? Mars-Elite linkages and the future of European Integration. European Union Politics, 8: 38-49.
• Tavits, Margit (2005). The Development of Stable Party Support. Electoral Dynamics in Post-Communist Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2): 283-295.
• Thomassen, Jacques and Schmitt, Hermann (1997). Policy Representation. European Journal of Political Research, 32(2): 165-184.
• Thomassen, Jacques and Schmitt, Hermann (1999). Introduction: Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. In: Schmitt, H. and Thomassen, J. (eds.). Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Van der Brug, Wouter and Van Spanje, Joost (2009). Immigration, Europe and the New Cultural Cleavage. European Journal of Political Research, 48: 308-334.
• Wagner, Markus (2011). Defining and Measuring Niche Parties. Party Politics, 18 (6): 845-864.
• Weissberg, Robert (1978). Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress. American Political Science Review, 72: 535-547.
• Wessels, Bernhard (1999). System Characteristics Matter: Empirical Evidence from Ten Representation Studies. In: Miller, W. et al. (eds.). Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press