Economía artificialuna valoración crítica

  1. Segismundo Izquierdo 1
  2. Luis Izquierdo 2
  3. José Galán 2
  4. José Santos 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

  2. 2 Universidad de Burgos
    info

    Universidad de Burgos

    Burgos, España

    ROR https://ror.org/049da5t36

Revista:
Revista de métodos cuantitativos para la economía y la empresa

ISSN: 1886-516X

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 22

Páginas: 36-54

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de métodos cuantitativos para la economía y la empresa

Resumen

La economía artificial es uno de los métodos o enfoques de investigación para el estudio de sistemas socioeconómicos complejos con mayor crecimiento durante los últimos años. Este artículo presenta una visión crítica sobre sus características, su potencial y los riesgos relativos al uso de esta metodología. Para ello, encontramos útil relacionar y comparar a la economía artificial con la economía teórica más tradicional. Desde nuestro análisis, la economía teórica y la economía artificial comparten los mismos objetivos, presentan menos diferencias metodológicas de las que a primera vista pudiera parecer, y sus aproximaciones son sin duda complementarias

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

También queremos agradecer el apoyo recibido del Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación del Reino de España a través del proyecto CSD2010-00034 (SIMULPAST).

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Amblard, F. (2010) "Construire des sociétés artificielles pour comprendre les phénomènes sociaux réels," Nouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales: Revue internationale de systémique complexe et d'études relationnelles, 5(2), 69–77.
  • Amman, H. M., Kendrick, D. A. and Rust, J. (1996) Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books.
  • Axelrod, R. (1997) "Advancing the Art of Simulation in the Social Sciences," in R. Conte, R. Hegselmann and P. Terna (eds.), Simulating Social Phenomena. Springer, pp. 21–40.
  • Axtell, R. (2000) "Why agents?: On the varied motivations for agent computing in the social sciences," Proceedings of the Workshop on Agent Simulation: Applications, Models and Tools: 3-24. Argonne National Laboratory, IL.
  • Batten, D. F. (2000) Discovering Artificial Economics: How Agents Learn and Economies Evolve. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
  • Binmore, K. (1998) "Robert Axelrod - The Complexity of Cooperation (Book review)", Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 1(1). Retrieved from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/1/1/review1.html
  • Binmore, K. (2011) Rational Decisions. Princeton University Press.
  • Chen, S.-H., Jain, L. and Tai, C.-C. (2006) Computational Economics: A Perspective from Computational Intelligence. Idea Group Publishing.
  • Cioffi-Revilla, C. (2010) "A methodology for complex social simulations", Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 13(1), 7. Retrieved from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/13/1/7.html
  • Colman, A. M. (1995) Game Theory and its Applications: In the Social and Biological Sciences, 2nd edition. Routledge.
  • Czerwiński, Z. (1958) "On the relation of statistical inference to traditional induction and deduction", Studia Logica, 7(1), 243–264.
  • Edmonds, B. (2007) "The practical modelling of context-dependent causal processes – A recasting of Robert Rosen’s thought", Chemistry & Biodiversity, 4(10), 2386–2395.
  • Edmonds, B. (2011) "Context in social simulation: why it can’t be wished away", Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 18(1), 5–21.
  • Epstein, J.M. (2006) "Remarks on the Foundations of Agent-Based Generative Social Science," in L. Tesfatsion and K.L. Judd (eds.), Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 2, pp. 1585–1604.
  • Epstein, J.M. (2006) Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling, STU - Stud. Princeton University Press.
  • Galán, J.M., Izquierdo, L.R., Izquierdo, S.S., Santos, J.I., Olmo, R. del, López-Paredes, A. and Edmonds, B. (2009) "Errors and Artefacts in Agent-Based Modelling", Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 12(1), 1. Retrieved from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/12/1/1.html
  • Gintis, H. (2014) The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences Revised edition. Princeton University Press.
  • Gotts, N.M., Polhill, J.G. and Law, A.N. R. (2003). "Agent-Based Simulation in the Study of Social Dilemmas", Artificial Intelligence Review, 19(1), 3–92.
  • Hassan, S., Arroyo, J., Galán, J.M., Antunes, L. and Pavón, J. (2013) "Asking the Oracle: Introducing Forecasting Principles into Agent-Based Modelling", Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 16(3), 13. Retrieved from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/13.html
  • Izquierdo, L.R., Izquierdo, S.S., Galán, J.M. and Santos, J.I. (2009) "Techniques to Understand Computer Simulations: Markov Chain Analysis", Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 12(1), 6. Retrieved from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/12/1/6.html
  • Izquierdo, L.R., Izquierdo, S.S., Galán, J.M. and Santos, J.I. (2013) "Combining Mathematical and Simulation Approaches to Understand the Dynamics of Computer Models," in B. Edmonds and R. Meyer (eds.), Simulating Social Complexity. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 235–271.
  • Izquierdo, S.S. and Izquierdo, L.R. (2013) "Stochastic Approximation to Understand Simple Simulation Models", Journal of Statistical Physics, 151(1-2), 254–276.
  • Izquierdo, L.R. and Polhill, J.G. (2006) "Is Your Model Susceptible to Floating-Point Errors?", Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9(4), 4. Retrieved from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/4/4.html
  • Jackson, M.O. (2010) Social and Economic Networks. Princeton University Press.
  • Kendrick, D.A. and Amman, H.M. (1999) "Programming Languages in Economics", Computational Economics, 14(1/2), 151–181.
  • Keynes, J.M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
  • Kulkarni, V.G. (2009) Modeling and Analysis of Stochastic Systems, 2nd edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC Texts in Statistical Science.
  • Kushner, H.J. and Yin, G.G. (1997) Stochastic Approximation Algorithms and Applications. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Leombruni, R. and Richiardi, M. (2005) "Why are economists sceptical about agent-based simulations?", Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 355(1), 103–109.
  • Mendelson, E. (1997) Introduction to Mathematical Logic, 4th edition. CRC Press.
  • Newman, M. (2010) Networks. An Introduction. Oxford University Press.
  • Polhill, J.G., Izquierdo, L.R. and Gotts, N.M. (2006) "What every agent-based modeller should know about floating point arithmetic", Environmental Modelling & Software, 21(3), 283–309.
  • Putnam, H. (1975) "What is mathematical truth?", Historia Mathematica, 2(4), 529–533.
  • Richiardi, M. G. (2012) "Agent-based computational economics: a short introduction", The Knowledge Engineering Review, 27(02), 137–149.
  • Richiardi, M., Leombruni, R., Saam, N. and Sonnessa, M. (2006) "A Common Protocol for Agent-Based Social Simulation", Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9(1), 15. Retrieved from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/1/15.html
  • Rosen, R. (2012) Anticipatory Systems: Philosophical, Mathematical, and Methodological Foundations, 2nd edition. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Sakoda, J.M. (1971) "The checkerboard model of social interaction," The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(1), 119–132.
  • Sandholm, W.H. (2010) Population Games and Evolutionary Dynamics. The MIT Press.
  • Schelling, T.C. (1971) "Dynamic models of segregation", The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2), 143–186.
  • Schmedders, K. and Judd, K.L. (2014) Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: North Holland.
  • Squazzoni, F. (2010) "The impact of agent-based models in the social sciences after 15 years of incursions", History of Economic Ideas, 18(2), 197–233.
  • Tesfatsion, L. (2002) "Agent-based computational economics: growing economies from the bottom up", Artificial Life, 8(1), 55–82.
  • Tesfatsion, L. (2003) "Agent-based computational economics: modeling economies as complex adaptive systems", Information Sciences, 149(4), 262–268.
  • Tesfatsion, L. (2006) "Agent-Based Computational Economics: A Constructive Approach to Economic Theory", in L. Tesfatsion and K.L. Judd (eds.), Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 2, pp. 831–880.
  • Tesfatsion, L. and Judd, K.L. (2006) Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 2: Agent-Based Computational Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Troitzsch, K.G. (2009) "Not All Explanations Predict Satisfactorily, and Not All Good Predictions Explain", Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 12(1), 10. Retrieved from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/12/1/10.html
  • Vega-Redondo, F. (2003) Economics and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press.
  • Weibull, J.W. (1995) Evolutionary Game Theory. The MIT Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet