Actividades básicas e instrumentales en relación a la situación de fragilidad

  1. Santamaría -Peláez, Miriam 1
  2. González-Bernal, Jerónimo 1
  3. González-Santos, Josefa 1
  4. Jahouh, Maha 1
  5. Collazo Riobó, Carla 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Burgos
    info

    Universidad de Burgos

    Burgos, España

    ROR https://ror.org/049da5t36

Journal:
International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology: INFAD. Revista de Psicología

ISSN: 0214-9877

Year of publication: 2019

Issue Title: Infancia y Psicología del Desarrollo

Volume: 2

Issue: 1

Pages: 283-290

Type: Article

DOI: 10.17060/IJODAEP.2019.N1.V2.1441 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology: INFAD. Revista de Psicología

Abstract

This descriptive transversal research studies frailty situation in older adults and basic and instrumental activities of daily living relationship through a 194 old institucionalized people sample.Frailty is measured with the Short Physical Performance Battery; basic activities of daily living with Barthel Index and instrumental activities of daily living with Lawton and Brody scale. Descriptive results show how the arithmetical averages in both activities of daily living decrease as the continuum robust-prefrail-frail-dependent advances towards dependency. There are significant differences in all subscales of Short Physical Performance Battery, as well as in Barthel and Lawton and Brody (p<,001). Regarding to Barthel and SPPB groups, significant differences among all of them were found (,007>p>,001), except in the robust-prefrail relation, where differences are not meaningful. Concerning Lawton and Brody, differences are significant (,041>p>,001); except in fragil-prefrail relation.The differences found between groups allow an early diagnosis and interventions aimed to prevent or reverse the progress towards a dependency situation.

Bibliographic References

  • Abizanda Soler, P. y Rodríguez Mañas, L. (2014). Evolución histórica del término “fragilidad”. Realidad actual. En S. E. Gerontología, Guía de buena práctica clínica en geratría. Fragilidad y nutricion en el anciano. Madrid, España: Coordinación editorial: International Marketing and Communication.
  • Abizanda, P., Sánchez-Jurado, P., Romero, L., Paterna, G., Martinez-Sánchez, E. y Atienzar-Núñez, P. (2011). Prevalence of frailty in a Spanish elderly population: The Frailty and Dependence in Albacete Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 59(7), 1356-1359.
  • Blanca, M. J., Alarcón, R., Arnau, J., Bono, R. y Bendayan, R. (2017). Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema, 29(4), 552-557.
  • Boyd, C. M., Xue, Q. L., Simpson, C. F., Guralnik, J. M. y Fried, L. P. (2005). Frailty, hospitalization and progression of disability in a cohort of disabled older womes. The American Journal of Medicine, 118, 1225-1231.
  • Centro Nacional de Excelencia Tecnológica y Salud (CENETEC). (2014). Diagnóstico y Tratamiento del síndrome de fragilidad en el adulto mayor. Guía de Referencia Rápida. Catálogo Maestro de Guían de Práctica Clínica. México D.F.
  • Da Silva González, Á., y Da Silva Domingo, G. (2017). La fragilidad. (I. R. Psicología, Ed.) International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 1(2), 13-32.
  • Dasgupta, M., Rolfson, D. B., Stolee, P., Borrie, M. J. y Speechley, M. (2007). Frailty is associated with postoperative complications in older adults with medical problams. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 48, 78-83.
  • Espinoza, S. E. y Fried, L. P. (2007). Risk factors for frailty in the older adult. Clinical Geriatrics, 15(6), 37-44.
  • Espinoza, S. y Walston, J. D. (2005). Frailty in older adults: Insights and interventions. Cleve Clin J Med, 72(12), 1105-1112.
  • Hilmer, S. N., Perera, V., Mitchel, S. y Murnion, B. P. (Diciembre de 2009). The assessment of frailty in older people in acute care. Australian Journal on Ageing, 28(4), 182-188.
  • Lesende, M., Gorroñogoitia, A., Gómez, J., Cortés, J. y Soler, P. (2010). El anciano frágil. Detección y manejo en atención primaria. Atención Primaria, 42(7), 388-393.
  • Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad. (2014). Documento consenso sobre fragilidad y caídas. Estrategia de promoción de la Salud y Prevención en el SNS. (S. S. Ministerio de Sanidad, Ed.) Madrid, España.
  • Redín, J. M. (1999). Valoración geriátrica integral (I). Evaluación del paciente geriátrico y concepto de fragilidad. ANALES, 22(1), 41-50.
  • Rockwood, K. (2005). What would make a definition of frailty successful? Age Ageing, 34(5), 432- 434.
  • Rolfson, D. B., Majumdar, S. R., Tahir, A. S. y Tsuyuki, R. T. (2001). Content validatios of a frailty checklist derived from comprenhensive geriatric assessment. Gerontology, 47
  • Rolfson, D. B., Mitnitski, A. y Rockwood, K. (2006). Cross validation of the Edmonton Frail Scale in a population survey. Annual meetin of the Canadian Geriatric Society.
  • Roubenoff, R. (2000). Sarcopenia: A major modifiable cause of frailty in the elderly. Journal of Nutrition Health and Aging(4), 140-142.
  • Walston, J. (2004). Frailty- the search for underlying causes. Sci Aging Knowledge Envirom, 2004(4).
  • Walston, J. (2012). Frailty. En D. Basow, UpToDate. Waltham: DS.
Data source: Dialnet