Long-Term Effect of Combination of Creatine Monohydrate Plus β-Hydroxy β-Methylbutyrate (HMB) on Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage and Anabolic/Catabolic Hormones in Elite Male Endurance Athletes

  1. Córdova, Alfredo
  2. Mielgo-Ayuso, Juan
  3. Fernández-Landa, Julen
  4. Fernández-Lázaro, Diego
  5. Calleja-González, Julio
  6. Caballero-García, Alberto
  7. León-Guereño, Patxi
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

  2. 2 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

  3. 3 Universidad de Deusto
    info

    Universidad de Deusto

    Bilbao, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00ne6sr39

Mostra les afiliacions +
Revista:
Biomolecules

ISSN: 2218-273X

Any de publicació: 2020

Volum: 10

Número: 1

Pàgines: 140

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.3390/BIOM10010140 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openUVADOC editor

Altres publicacions en: Biomolecules

Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible

Resum

Creatine monohydrate (CrM) and β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB) are widely studied ergogenic aids. However, both supplements are usually studied in an isolated manner. The few studies that have investigated the effect of combining both supplements on exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) and hormone status have reported controversial results. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to determine the effect and degree of potentiation of 10 weeks of CrM plus HMB supplementation on EIMD and anabolic/catabolic hormones. This study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial where participants (n = 28) were randomized into four different groups: placebo group (PLG; n = 7), CrM group (CrMG; 0.04 g/kg/day of CrM; n = 7), HMB group (HMBG; 3 g/day of HMB; n = 7), and CrM-HMB group (CrM-HMBG; 0.04 g/kg/day of CrM plus 3 g/day of HMB; n = 7). Before (baseline, T1) and after 10 weeks of supplementation (T2), blood samples were collected from all rowers. There were no significant differences in the EIMD markers (aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and creatine kinase) among groups. However, we observed significant differences in CrM-HMBG with respect to PLG, CrMG, and HMBG on testosterone (p = 0.006; η2p = 0.454) and the testosterone/cortisol ratio (T/C; p = 0.032; η2p = 0.349). Moreover, we found a synergistic effect of combined supplementation on testosterone (CrM-HMBG = −63.85% vs. CrMG + HMBG = −37.89%) and T/C (CrM-HMBG = 680% vs. CrMG + HMBG = 57.68%) and an antagonistic effect on cortisol (CrM-HMBG = 131.55% vs. CrMG + HMBG = 389.99%). In summary, the combination of CrM plus HMB showed an increase in testosterone and T/C compared with the other groups after 10 weeks of supplementation. Moreover, this combination presented a synergistic effect on testosterone and T/C and an antagonistic effect on cortisol compared with the sum of individual or isolated supplementation.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • 10.1080/17461391.2012.730061
  • 10.3390/nu10121968
  • 10.3390/nu11030500
  • 10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08169-0
  • 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.09.004
  • 10.1515/CCLM.2010.179
  • 10.1038/srep19614
  • 10.1097/00005768-199803000-00011
  • 10.1093/bmb/ldm014
  • 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ce2423
  • 10.1007/BF00422840
  • 10.20960/nh.763
  • Slimani, (2018), J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness, 58, pp. 707
  • Mastorakos, (2005), Hormones (Athens), 4, pp. 73
  • 10.1007/s40279-018-0969-2
  • 10.1007/s40279-015-0306-y
  • 10.1055/s-2007-1024677
  • 10.2165/00007256-199520040-00004
  • Thomas, (2016), Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 48, pp. 543
  • 10.12965/jer.1836244.122
  • 10.1186/1550-2783-6-13
  • 10.1123/ijsnem.23.4.378
  • 10.1007/s00421-009-1305-1
  • 10.1016/j.scispo.2014.03.006
  • 10.1016/j.scispo.2011.07.003
  • 10.1186/s12970-017-0173-z
  • 10.1007/s00726-016-2252-x
  • 10.1042/CS20030116
  • 10.1017/S0007114512005387
  • 10.1016/S0899-9007(00)00376-2
  • 10.1152/jappl.2000.89.4.1340
  • 10.1007/s00421-014-2854-5
  • 10.3390/nu9121316
  • 10.1017/S0007114517003907
  • 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001361
  • 10.1007/s00421-011-2224-5
  • 10.1042/bj3030021
  • 10.1016/j.ghir.2010.12.006
  • 10.1186/s12970-014-0055-6
  • Stout, (2006), J. Strength Cond. Res., 20, pp. 928
  • Boegman, (2016), Curr. Sports Med. Rep., 15, pp. 252, 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000281
  • 10.1186/1550-2783-10-6
  • 10.1007/s00421-015-3181-1
  • Faramarzi, (2009), Braz. J. Biomotricity, 3, pp. 366
  • 10.1123/ijsnem.13.2.184
  • 10.1016/S0899-9007(01)00540-8
  • Zajac, (2003), J. Hum. Kinet., 10, pp. 95
  • 10.1016/j.jand.2015.12.006
  • 10.1123/ijsnem.20.6.515
  • 10.1249/mss.0b013e31806010e0
  • Stewart, (2011)
  • Carter, (1982), pp. 107
  • 10.1093/ajcn/72.3.796
  • 10.1139/apnm-2015-0100
  • 10.1186/1550-2783-10-55
  • Farrán, (2004)
  • 10.1037/a0015808
  • 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0759
  • Banfi, (2006), J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness, 46, pp. 611
  • 10.1046/j.1365-201x.2000.00715.x
  • 10.1007/s00726-015-2126-7
  • 10.1007/s40279-014-0146-1
  • 10.1111/j.1600-0838.1998.tb00181.x
  • 10.3390/nu11102528
  • O’Connor, (2003), J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness, 43, pp. 64
  • 10.3390/jfmk4040067
  • Brownlee, (2005), J. Sport. Sci. Med., 4, pp. 76
  • 10.3390/nu12010193