The Role of Hip Joint Clearance Discrepancy as Other Clinical Predictor of Reinjury and Injury Severity in Hamstring Tears in Elite Athletes

  1. Palavicini, Martin
  2. Rodríguez-Pérez, Vicente
  3. Mielgo-Ayuso, Juan
  4. Sánchez-Herráez, Sergio
  5. Seco-Calvo, Jesus
  6. Abecia-Inchaurregui, Luis Carlos
  1. 1 Universidad de León
    info

    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

  2. 2 Departament of Kinesiology, College of Health and Human Services, California State University
  3. 3 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

  4. 4 Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León
    info

    Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05gn84d31

  5. 5 Universidad de Burgos
    info

    Universidad de Burgos

    Burgos, España

    ROR https://ror.org/049da5t36

Revista:
Journal of Clinical Medicine

ISSN: 2077-0383

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 10

Número: 5

Páginas: 1050

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3390/JCM10051050 GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Journal of Clinical Medicine

Resumen

Hamstring tear injuries (HTI) are the most prevalent injuries in athletes, with high reinjury rates. To prevent reinjury and reduce the severity of injuries, it is essential to identify potential risk factors. Hip characteristics are fundamental to optimal hamstring function. We sought to investigate the role of hip joint clearance discrepancy (JCD) as a risk factor for HTI and a clinical predictor of risk of reinjury and injury severity. A cross-sectional, retrospective study was performed with elite athletes (n = 100) who did (n = 50) and did not (n = 50) have a history of injury. X-rays were taken to assess JCD. We reviewed muscular lesions historial, and health records for the previous 5 years. Significant differences were found in injury severity (p = 0.026; ŋ2p = 0.105) and a number of injuries (p = 0.003; ŋ2p = 0.172). The multivariate analysis data indicated that JCD was significantly associated with the number of injuries and their severity (p < 0.05). In the stepwise regression model, JCD variability explained 60.1% of the number of injuries (R2 0.601) and 10.5% of injury severity (R2 0.0105). These results suggest that JCD could play an important role as a risk factor for HTI and also as a clinical predictor of reinjury and injury severity.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • 10.1016/j.ptsp.2006.02.001
  • 10.1177/1941738108324962
  • 10.1136/bjsm.2002.002352
  • 10.1016/j.csm.2006.06.011
  • 10.1177/0363546507301258
  • 10.1080/02640414.2019.1641016
  • 10.2165/11594800-000000000-00000
  • 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000052
  • 10.1136/bjsm.2006.026609
  • 10.1177/0363546509358381
  • Tokutake, (2018), J. Sports Sci. Med., 17, pp. 650
  • 10.1136/bjsm.2010.081695
  • 10.1177/0363546506294679
  • 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090664
  • 10.1136/bjsm.2003.011197
  • 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2005.00441.x
  • 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095362
  • 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093737
  • 10.1136/bjsm.2008.048181
  • 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000091
  • 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098862
  • 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001975
  • 10.1007/s40279-017-0819-7
  • 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098630
  • 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096130
  • 10.1007/s40279-016-0638-2
  • 10.1177/2325967116681524
  • 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090325
  • 10.1177/0363546505283835
  • 10.1097/00042752-200603000-00014
  • 10.2519/jospt.2010.3047
  • 10.2519/jospt.2013.4343
  • 10.1080/02640414.2019.1664030
  • 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098971
  • 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109782
  • 10.1007/s00586-019-06129-4
  • 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109669
  • 10.1177/2325967119894962
  • 10.1097/00007632-198011000-00007
  • 10.1016/0268-0033(92)90006-P
  • 10.2519/jospt.2016.5986
  • 10.12968/hmed.2018.79.7.389
  • 10.1080/02640414.2012.722225
  • 10.1080/02640414.2015.1026375
  • 10.1080/14763141.2016.1234639
  • 10.1080/14763141.2018.1473479
  • 10.1007/s40279-019-01138-1
  • 10.1111/sms.12723
  • 10.1080/02640414.2017.1409608
  • 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093241
  • 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091448
  • 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093302
  • 10.1007/s11999-014-4038-3
  • 10.2214/AJR.06.0921
  • 10.1037/a0015808
  • 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002645
  • 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.05.026
  • 10.1111/sms.13069
  • 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097089
  • 10.1155/2014/457573
  • 10.1002/jor.20114
  • 10.1016/j.csm.2016.02.010
  • 10.1007/s00221-019-05648-2
  • 10.1177/0363546511414635
  • 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096743
  • 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.02.008
  • Zebala, (2007), Iowa Orthop. J., 27, pp. 71
  • 10.1080/14763140701489728
  • 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090534
  • 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.10.019
  • 10.1016/S1466-853X(03)00053-1
  • 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.09.003
  • 10.1007/s40279-013-0097-y
  • 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a55200
  • 10.1111/sms.12464
  • 10.1007/s00421-012-2379-8
  • 10.1080/14763141.2020.1748099
  • 10.1111/sms.13437
  • 10.1098/rsos.180332
  • 10.1002/cphy.c100092
  • 10.1152/jappl.1993.74.2.520
  • 10.1152/japplphysiol.00524.2005
  • 10.32098/mltj.02.2019.03
  • 10.1093/bmb/ldu006
  • 10.1007/s40279-017-0796-x
  • 10.32098/mltj.04.2020.12
  • 10.1016/j.jshs.2017.04.001
  • 10.1007/s00256-008-0546-0
  • 10.1007/s00264-017-3431-4
  • 10.32098/mltj.04.2013.02
  • Maffulli, (2014), Transl. Med. UniSa, 12, pp. 14