Anthropometric profile, body composition and somatotype in elite traditional rowersA cross-sectional study

  1. León Guereño, Patxi 1
  2. Urdampilleta, Aritz
  3. Zourdos, Michael C.
  4. Mielgo-Ayuso, Juan 23
  1. 1 Universidad de Deusto
    info

    Universidad de Deusto

    Bilbao, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00ne6sr39

  2. 2 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

  3. 3 Florida Atlantic University
    info

    Florida Atlantic University

    Boca de Ratones, Estados Unidos

    ROR https://ror.org/05p8w6387

Revista:
Revista española de nutrición humana y dietética

ISSN: 2173-1292

Ano de publicación: 2018

Volume: 22

Número: 4

Páxinas: 279-286

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.14306/RENHYD.22.4.605 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista española de nutrición humana y dietética

Resumo

Introduction: Given the importance of body composition in sports performance, it is vital to have references of elite athletes which serve as a guide when it comes to overseeing diet and training.The aim of this study was to describe the anthropometric values of an elite team of traditional rowers in order to build an anthropometric profile in this sport. Material and methods: A cross-sectional design with twenty elite, male traditional rowers aged at 29.3 (3.6) years reported to the laboratory on a single day at the start of the competitive season. Height, wingspan, body mass, 8 skinfolds, 2 bone diameters and 6 perimeters were measured by the same internationally certified anthropometrist. Anthropometric measurements were taken following the International Society of Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) protocol. Fat mass was calculated using different equations for athletes and muscle mass using the Lee equation. For the somatotype components, the Carter and Heath equation was applied.Results: elite traditional rowers had a wingspan of 189 (5.8) cm, body fat percentage of 8.0 (1.2)% (Carter), 8.0 (1.8) (Withers), 7.0 (1.2)% (Yuhasz), and 10.9 (1.1)% (Faulkner). Muscle mass was 43.3 (2.4)% (Lee). The somatotype was endo-mesomorphic with endomorphy values of 3.5 (0.4), mesomorphy 4.7 (0.6) and ectomorphy 2.4 (3.5).Conclusion: These results suggest that wingspan seems to be of great importance for elite traditional rowers; while average height may not be as important for performance as wingspan. Meanwhile, reducing body fat percentage is likely to be beneficial in order to achieve elite rowing status.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • (1) González-Aramendi JM, Santisteban J, Ainz F. Valoración funcional en laboratorio del remero de banco fijo. Arch Med Deporte. 1996;XIII(52):99-105.
  • (2) Badiola JJ, Aparicio AC, Fernandez-García B. Cinética del lactato y variables fisiológicas relacionadas con el rendimiento en una regata de traineras. Infocoes. 2001;VI(1):36-48.
  • (3) Cosgrove MJ, Wilson J, Watt D, Grant SF. The relationship between selected physiological variables of rowers and rowing performance as determined by a 2000 m ergometer test. J Sports Sci. 1999;17(11):845-52.
  • (4) Shephard RJ. Science and medicine of rowing: A review. J Sports Sci. 1998;16(7):603-20.
  • (5) Akça F. Prediction of rowing ergometer performance from functional anaerobic power, strength and anthropometric components. J Hum Kinet. 2014;41:133-42.
  • (6) Penichet-Tomás A, Pueo B. Performance conditional factors in rowing (Factores condicionales de rendimiento en remo). Retos. 2017;32:238-40.
  • (7) Mielgo-Ayuso J, Maroto-Sánchez B, Luzardo-Socorro R, Palacios G, Palacios Gil-Antuñano N, González-Gross M, et al. Evaluation of nutritional status and energy expenditure in athletes. Nutr Hosp. 2015;31(Suppl 3):227-36.
  • (8) Mielgo-Ayuso J, Zourdos MC, Calleja-González J, Urdampilleta A, Ostojic SM. Dietary intake habits and controlled training on body composition and strength in elite female volleyball players during the season. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015;40(8):827-34.
  • (9) Winkert K, Steinacker JM, Machus K, Dreyhaupt J, Treff G. Anthropometric profiles are associated with long-term career attainment in elite junior rowers: A retrospective analysis covering 23 years. Eur J Sport Sci. 2018;
  • (10) Lidor R, Ziv G. Physical and physiological attributes of female volleyball players--a review. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(7):1963-73.
  • (11) Ziv G, Lidor R. Physical attributes, physiological characteristics, on-court performances and nutritional strategies of female and male basketball players. Sports Med. 2009;39(7):547-68.
  • (12) Pons V, Riera J, Galilea PA, Drobnic F, Banquells M, Ruiz O. Características antropométricas, composición corporal y somatotipo por deportes. Datos de referencia del CAR de San Cugat, 1989-2013. Apunts Med Esport. 2015;50(186):65-72.
  • (13) Adhikari A, McNeely E. Anthropometric Characteristic, Somatotype and Body Composition of Canadian Female Rowers. Am J Sports Sci. 2015;3(3):61.
  • (14) International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry, editor. International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. Glasgow: ISAK; 2016.
  • (15) Mielgo-Ayuso J, Calleja-González J, Clemente-Suárez VJ, Zourdos MC. Influence of anthropometric profile on physical performance in elite female volleyballers in relation to playing position. Nutr Hosp. 2014;31(2):849-57.
  • (16) Cabañas MD, Esparza F. Compendio de cineantropometría. Madrid: CTO Editorial; 2009.
  • (17) Alvero Cruz JR, Cabañas MD, Herrero de Lucas A, Martínez Riaza L, Moreno Pascual C, Porta Manzanillo J, et al. Protocolo de valoración de la composición corporal para el reconocimiento médico-deportivo. Documento de consenso del grupo español de cineantropometría de la federación española de medicina del deporte. Arch Med Deporte. 2009;XXVI(131):166-79.
  • (18) Carter JEL, Heath BH. Somatotyping-development and applications. Cambridge [England]; New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
  • (19) Mujika I, de Txabarri RG, Maldonado-Martín S, Pyne DB. Warm-up intensity and duration’s effect on traditional rowing time-trial performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2012;7(2):186-8.
  • (20) Baudouin A, Hawkins D. A biomechanical review of factors affecting rowing performance. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36(6):396-402.
  • (21) Kerr DA, Ross WD, Norton K, Hume P, Kagawa M, Ackland TR. Olympic lightweight and open-class rowers possess distinctive physical and proportionality characteristics. J Sports Sci. 2007;25(1):43-53.
  • (22) Mikulic P. Anthropometric and physiological profiles of rowers of varying ages and ranks. Kinesiology. 2008;40(1):80-8.
  • (23) Mikulic P. Anthropometric and metabolic determinants of 6,000-m rowing ergometer performance in internationally competitive rowers. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(6):1851-7.
  • (24) Ingham SA, Whyte GP, Jones K, Nevill AM. Determinants of 2,000 m rowing ergometer performance in elite rowers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002;88(3):243-6.
  • (25) Bourgois J, Claessens AL, Vrijens J, Philippaerts R, Van Renterghem B, Thomis M, et al. Anthropometric characteristics of elite male junior rowers. Br J Sports Med. 2000;34(3):213-7.
  • (26) Bourgois J, Claessens AL, Janssens M, Van Renterghem B, Loos R, Thomis M, et al. Anthropometric characteristics of elite female junior rowers. J Sports Sci. 2001;19(3):195-202.
  • (27) Barrett RS, Manning JM. Relationships between rigging set-up, anthropometry, physical capacity, rowing kinematics and rowing performance. Sports Biomech. 2004;3(2):221-35.
  • (28) Young KC, Kendall KL, Patterson KM, Pandya PD, Fairman CM, Smith SW. Rowing performance, body composition, and bone mineral density outcomes in college-level rowers after a season of concurrent training. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9(6):966-72.
  • (29) Kuzuhara K, Katai K, Hojo T, Fujisawa Y, Kimura M, Yanagida Y, et al. Seasonal changes in anthropometric, physiological, nutritional, and performance factors in collegiate rowers. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;
  • (30) Reilly T. Fitness assessment. In: T. Reilly, editor. Science and Soccer London: E & FN Spon; 2006. p. 25-50.