UBUIngenio: extracurricular enrichment programme for the improvement of high ability students’ creative thinking

  1. Martha Lucía Orozco Gómez 1
  2. Radu Bogdan Toma 1
  3. José Luis Cuesta Gómez 1
  4. María Merino Martínez 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Burgos
    info

    Universidad de Burgos

    Burgos, España

    ROR https://ror.org/049da5t36

  2. 2 Asociación Autismo Burgos
Zeitschrift:
Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología

ISSN: 0120-0534

Datum der Publikation: 2023

Ausgabe: 55

Nummer: 0

Seiten: 212-218

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.14349/RLP.2023.V55.23 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología

Projekte im Zusammenhang

UBUingenio: Plan para la educación del talento, la excelencia y el ingenio-TECNOARTEA

2019/00126/001

Zusammenfassung

Antecedentes: Los estudiantes con alta capacidad requieren estrategias educativas efectivas. Este estudio presenta y evalúa un programa de enriquecimiento curricular diseñado para mejorar la creatividad. El programa se basa en un marco de competencias y se implementó utilizando variaciones de estrategias de aprendizaje basado en proyectos (ABP). Método: Un diseño cuasi-experimental comparó dos intervenciones utilizando grupos pretest y postest. La primera intervención consistió en una unidad de ABP de 12 semanas centrada en el diseño de un videojuego utilizando programación basada en bloques mediante Scratch. La segunda intervención, también de 12 semanas de duración, consistió en tres proyectos independientes de diseño vectorial y programación de un robot basado en Arduino. En ambas intervenciones se utilizaron estrategias para el desarrollo del pensamiento creativo. La muestra incluía estudiantes con altas capacidades de entre 8 y 12 años. Resultados: Ambas intervenciones aumentaron significativamente la creatividad, sin diferencias estadísticas entre ellas. Esto sugiere que ambos tipos de intervenciones de ABP mejoraron efectivamente la creatividad de los participantes. Conclusiones: Este estudio sugiere que los programas de enriquecimiento curricular basados en ABP son efectivos para fomentar la creatividad entre los estudiantes con altas capacidades.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Abidin, Z., Herman, T., Jupri, A., & Farokhah, L. (2021). Gifted children’s mathematical reasoning abilities on problem-based learning and project-based learning literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1720(1), 012018. https://doi. org/10.1088/1742-6596/1720/1/012018
  • Arán Filippetti, V., & Krumm, G. (2020). A hierarchical model of cognitive flexibility in children: Extending the relationship between flexibility, creativity and academic achievement. Child Neuropsychology, 26(6), 770-800. https://doi.org/10.1080/092 97049.2019.1711034
  • Budi, K. S., Muslim, S., & Santosa, A. B. (2019). Literature study on the influence of Arduino microcontroller trainer media on creative thinking level and student learning outcomes in microcontroller learning. International Symposium on Social Sciences, Education, and Humanities (ISSEH 2018) (pp. 90-94). Atlantis Press.
  • Campos, V., Trott, A., Xiong, C., Socher, R., Giró-i-Nieto, X., & Torres, J. (2020). Explore, discover and learn: Unsupervised discovery of state-covering skills. International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 1317-1327). PMLR.
  • Candrasekaran, S. (2014). Developing scientific attitude, critical thinking and creative intelligence of higher secondary school biology students by applying synectics techniques. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 3(6), 1-8. https://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v3(6)/Version-2/ A03620108.pdf
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th edition). Routledge.
  • Corbalán Berná, F. J., Martínez Zaragoza, F., Donolo, D. S., Alonso Monreal, C., Tejerina Arreal, Mª., & Limiñana Gras, R. M. (2015). CREA Inteligencia creativa. Una medida cognitiva de la creatividad. Tea Ediciones.
  • Cropley, A. (2012). Creativity and education: An Australian perspective. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 22(1), 9-26.
  • Diffily, D. (2002). Project-based learning: Meeting social studies standards and the needs of gifted learners. Gifted Child Today, 25(3), 40-59.
  • Dogan, M., & Pahre, R. (2019). Creative marginality: Innovation at the intersections of social sciences. Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9780429044526
  • Fatimah, S. (2018). The effect of project-based science learning on PGSD students’ creative thinking ability. Journal Pendidikan Indonesia, 7(2), 100-105.
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  • Ferragut, M., & Fierro Bardají, A. (2012). Inteligencia emocional, bienestar personal y rendimiento académico en preadolescentes. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44(3), 95-104.
  • Fitzgerald, M. S. (2020). Overlapping opportunities for social-emotional and literacy learning in elementary-grade project-based instruction. American Journal of Education, 126(4), 573-601. https://doi.org/10.1086/709545
  • Folsom, C. (2005). Making conceptual connections between gifted and general education: Teaching for intellectual and emotional learning (TIEL). Roeper Review, 28(2), 79-87.
  • Gómez-Pérez, M. M., Mata-Sierra, S., García-Martín, M. B., Calero-García, M. D., Molinero-Caparrós, C., & Bonete-Román, S. (2014). Valoración de un programa de habilidades interpersonales en niños superdotados. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 46(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0120- 0534(14)70007-x
  • Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79-96). Cambridge University Press.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444– 454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
  • Guven, G., Kozcu Cakir, N., Sulun, Y., Cetin, G., & Guven, E. (2022). Arduino-assisted robotics coding applications integrated into the 5E learning model in science teaching. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 108-126. https://doi.org/10. 1080/15391523.2020.1812136
  • Hawari, A. D. M., & Noor, A. I. M. (2020). Project based learning pedagogical design in STEAM art education. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 102-111.
  • Hayhoe, R., García Ruiz, M. J., & Martínez Usarralde, M. J. (2022). Creativity, curiosity and new thinking in comparative education in relation to the new norms of the XXIst century. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, (40), 10-14. https://doi. org/10.5944/reec.40.2022.32096
  • Horkoff, J., Maiden, N., & Asboth, D. (2019). Creative goal modeling for innovative requirements. Information and Software Technology, 106, 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. infsof.2018.09.005
  • Husna, A., Cahyono, E., & Fianti, F. (2019). The effect of project based learning model aided scratch media toward learning outcomes and creativity. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 8(1), 1-7. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise/ article/view/25584
  • Jakubakynov, B., Berechikidze, I., Kartashova, O., & Kochetkova, G. (2021). Gifted students creativity: The role of preliminary orientation and individual learning strategies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tsc.2021.100883
  • Jiang, C., & Pang, Y. (2023). Enhancing design thinking in engineering students with project-based learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31, 814–830. https:// doi.org/10.1002/cae.22608
  • Johnsen, S. K. (2021). Definitions, models, and characteristics of gifted students. Identifying gifted students (pp. 1-32). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003235682-1
  • Karyawati, A., & Ashadi, A. (2018). Innovation in the classroom: Engaging English as a foreign learning student using project-based learning. Lingtera, 5(1), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.21831/lt. v5i1.17067
  • Kim, K. H. (2008). Underachievement and creativity: Are gifted underachievers highly creative? Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 234-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802060232
  • Kobsiripat, W. (2015). Effects of the media to promote the scratch programming capabilities of creativity of elementary school students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 227- 232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.651
  • Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155-163. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
  • Lew, K. H. (2012). TA longitudinal study of the effect of creativity educational program. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 13(10), 4536-4542. https://doi. org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.10.4536
  • Lin, W. L., & Shih, Y. L. (2022). Developmental trends of different creative potentials in relation to adolescents’ critical thinking abilities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 100979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100979
  • Liu, Z., & Schonwetter, D. J. (2004). Teaching creativity in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(5), 801-808. https://www.ijee.ie/articles/Vol20-5/IJEE1511.pdf
  • López Zafra, E., & Jiménez Morales, I. (2009). Inteligencia emocional y rendimiento escolar: estado actual de la cuestión. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 41(1), 69-80.
  • Makkonen, T., Tirri, K., & Lavonen, J. (2021). Engagement in learning physics through project-based learning: A case study of gifted finnish upper-secondary-level students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 32(4), 501-532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X211018644
  • Matthews, G., Lin, J., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2018). Emotional intelligence and giftedness. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 585–600). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-038
  • Miner-Romanoff, K., Rae, A., & Zakrzewski, C. E. (2019). A holistic and multifaceted model for ill-structured experiential problem-based learning: Enhancing student critical thinking and communication skills. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 7(1), 70-96. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs. jpblhe.v7i1.3341
  • Moreno, C. (2022). Pedagogía socio constructivista para promover aprendizajes creativos: socio-constructive pedagogy to promote creative learning. Revista Episteme, 3, 127-146. http:// revistas.unellez.edu.ve/index.php/retm/article/view/1658
  • Noh, J., & Lee, J. (2020). Effects of robotics programming on the computational thinking and creativity of elementary school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 463-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09708-w
  • Ozyaprak, M. (2016). The effectiveness of SCAMPER technique on creative thinking skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted young scientists, 4(1), 31-40. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ jegys/issue/37319/430616
  • Pelfrey, R. (2011). Classroom behaviors in elementary school teachers identified as fostering creativity. Northern Kentucky University.
  • Ravitz, J., Hixson, N., English, M., & Mergendoller, J. (2012, April). Using project based learning to teach 21st century skills: Findings from a statewide initiative. American Educational Research Association Conference, Vancouver, Canada
  • Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 150-159. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0016986212444901
  • Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2021). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for talent development. Routledge.
  • Runco, M. A., & Pritzker, S. R. (Eds.). (2020). Encyclopedia of creativity. Academic press.
  • Sastre-Riba, S., & Pascual-Sufrate, M. T. (2013). Alta capacidad intelectual, resolución de problemas y creatividad (High intellectual capacity, problem solving and creativity). Revista de neurología, 56(1), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.33588/ rn.56S01.2013025
  • Serikbayeva, A., & Beisenbayeva, L. (2020). Synectics as a modern method of solving creative problems. Paradigm Shifts in 21st Century Teaching and Learning (pp. 145-157). IGI Global.
  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin and Company.
  • Shatunova, O., Anisimova, T., Sabirova, F., & Kalimullina, O. (2019). STEAM as an innovative educational technology. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(2), 131-144. Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. The Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1953.97 12897
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2020). Transformational giftedness: Rethinking our paradigm for gifted education. Roeper Review, 42(4), 230- 240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1815266
  • Su, Y. S., Shao, M., & Zhao, L. (2022). Effect of mind mapping on creative thinking of children in scratch visual programming education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(4), 906-929. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211053383
  • Supena, I., Darmuki, A., & Hariyadi, A. (2021). The influence of 4C (constructive, critical, creativity, collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 873-892. https://doi.org/10.29333/ iji.2021.14351a
  • Toma, R. B. (2021). Measuring acceptance of block-based coding environments. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28, 241- 251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09562-x
  • Wu, T. T., & Wu, Y. T. (2020). Applying project-based learning and SCAMPER teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100631
  • Wulansari, R., Rusnayati, H., Saepuzaman, D., Karim, S., & Feranie, S. A. (2019). The influence of scientific creativity and critical worksheets (SCCW) on creative thinking skills and critical scientific as well as students’ cognitive abilities on project-based learning work and energy concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5). https://doi. org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052039
  • Yuste H. C., Yuste Peña D. & Galve Manzano J.L. (2012). BADyG (Batería de Aptitudes Diferenciales y Generales - Battery of Differential and General Aptitudes). CEPE editorial.
  • Yuvaci, Z., & Daglioglu, H. E. (2016). Teacher’s part to support creativeness of gifted children in pre-school period and activity examples. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 8(1), 39-61.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet