Estudio previo en el diseño y validación de un instrumento para identificar el conocimiento sobre Naturaleza de STEM

Bibliographic References

• Ackay, B. y Ackay, H. (2015). Effectiveness of Science-Technology-Society (STS) Instruction on Student Understanding of the Nature of Science and Attitudes toward Science. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 3(1), 37-45.
• Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2014). Teaching the Nature of Science with scientific narratives. Interchange, 45, 167–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-015-9229-7
• Aikenhead, G. S. (2015). Humanist perspectives on Science Education. En R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 467-471). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0_364
• Aikenhead, G. S. y Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument “Views on science-technology-society” (VOSTS). Science Education, 76, 477-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760503
• Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) Science. Science Education, 95(3), 518-542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20432
• Allchin, D. (2012) Teaching the nature of science through scientific errors. Science Education, 96, 904-926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21019
• Bandalos, D. L. y Finney, S. J. (2010). Factor analysis: exploratory and confirmatory. En G. R. Hancock y R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods. Routledge.
• Blanco Fontao, C., del Pino, J., Pereira, F. J. y Arias-Gago, A. R. (2023). Cambios en la per-cepción de la ciencia derivados de la pandemia de la COVID-19. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 41(3), 53-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.5760
• Caldararo, N. (2002). Human ecological intervention and the role of forest fires in human ecology. The Science of the Total Environment, 292, 141-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01067-1
• Capraro, M. M., Capraro, R. M., y Morgan, J. R. (Eds.). (2013). STEM project-based learning: an integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. Sense Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6
• Dare, E. A., Keratithamkul, K., Hitwatig, B. M. y Li, F. (2021) Beyond content: the role of STEM disciplines, real-world problems, 21st Century skills, and STEM careers within science teachers’ conceptions of integrated STEM education. Education Sciences, 11, 737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110737
• Erduran, S., Dagher, Z. R. y McDonald, C. V. (2019). Contributions of the Family Resemblance Approach to nature of science in science education. Science & Education, 28, 311-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00052-2
• Erduran, S. (2020). Nature of “STEM”? Epistemic underpinnings of integrated Science, Techonology, Engineering and Mathematics in Education. Science & Education, 29(3), 781-784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00150-6
• Fernández, I., Gil, D., Carrascosa, J., Chachapuz, A. y Praia, J. (2002). Visiones deformadas de la ciencia transmitidas por la enseñanza. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 20(3), 477-488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3962
• Funtowicz, S. O. y Ravetz, J. R. (2000). La ciencia posnormal. Kluwer.
• García-Ruíz, J. M., Lasanta, T., Nada-Romero, E., Lana-Renault, N. y Álvarez-Farizo, B. (2020). Rewilding and restoring cultural landscapes in mediterranean mountains: opportunities and challenges. Land Use Policy, 99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104850
• George, D. y Mallery, P. (1995). SPSS/PC + Step. A simple guide and reference. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
• Goldman, S. L. (2013). Why we need a philosophy of engineering: a work in progress. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 29(2), 163-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/030801804225012572
• Gomes, L., Miranda H. S. y Bustamante, M. M. (2018). How can we advance the knowledge on the behavior and effects of fire in the Cerrado biome? Forest Ecology and Management, 417, 281-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.02.032
• Gómez-Sánchez, E., Lucas-Borja, M. E., Plaza-Álvarez, P. A., González-Romero, J., Sagra, J., Moya, D. y De Las Heras, J. (2019). Effects of post-fire hillsope stabilisation techniques on chemical, physico-chemical and microbiological soil properties in mediterranean forest ecosystems. Journal of Environmental Management, 246, 229-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.150
• Greca, I. M., Ortiz-Revilla, J. y Arriasecq, I. (2021). Diseño y evaluación de una secuencia de enseñanza-aprendizaje STEAM para Educación Primaria. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 18(1), 1802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2021.v18.i1.1802
• Gresnigt, R., Taconis, R., van Keulen, H. Gravemeijer, K. y Baartman, L. (2014). Promoting Science and technology in primary education: A review of integrated curricula. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 47-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.877694
• Guzey, S. S., Harwell, M. y Moore, T. (2014). Development of an instrument to assess attitudes toward science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 271-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12077
• Hetemäki, L. (2019). The role of science in forest policy-Experiences by EFI. Forest Policy and Economics, 105, 10-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.014
• Hughes, T. P. (2012). The evolution of large technological systems. En W. E. Biker, T. P. Hughes y T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 45-77). MIT Press.
• Irzik, G., y Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20(7-8), 591-607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9293-4
• Irzik, G. y Nola, R. (2014). New directions for nature of science research. En M. Matthews (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching (pp. 999–1021). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_30
• Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second-generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817
• Kang, N-H. (2019). A review of the effect of integrated STEM or STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) education in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(6), 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0034-y
• Kaya, E. y Erduran, S. (2016). From FRA to RFN, how the family resemblance approach can be transformed for science curriculum analysis on nature of science. Science & Education, 25(9-10), 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9861-3
• Lake, F. K., Wright, V., Morgan, P., McFadzen, M., Mcwethy, D. y Stevens-Rumann, C. (2017). Returning fire to the land: celebrating traditional knowledge and fire. Journal of Forestry, 115(5), 343-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.2016-043R2
• Land, M. H. (2013). Full STEAM ahead: the benefits of integrating the Arts into STEM. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 547-552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.317
• Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A. y Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151-1169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
• Lombrozo, T., Thanukos, A. y Weisberg, M. (2008) The importance of understanding the Nature of Science for accepting evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1, 290–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0061-8
• López-Aguado, M., y Guitiérrez-Provecho, L. (2019). Com dur a terme i interpretar una anàlisi factorial exploratòria utilizando SPSS. Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació, 12(2), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2019.12.227057
• López-Rupérez, F., Expósito-Casas, E., y García-García, I. (2019). Educación científica y brecha de género en España en alumnos de 15 años. Análisis secundarios de PISA 2015. Revista Complutense de Educación, 32(1), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.66090
• Martín-Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales-Palacios, F. J. y Vílchez-González, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 103(3), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522
• Martínez-Martínez, V., Greca, I. M. y Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2023). Enseñanza de la naturaleza de la ciencia a partir de la ecología del fuego. En P. Membiela y M.I. Cebreiros (Eds.) Estrategias metodológicas e investigación en la enseñanza de las ciencias (pp. 117-122). Educación Editora.
• Michel, H. y Neumann, I. (2017). Nature of Science and Science Content Learning: The Relation Between Students’ Nature of Science Understanding and Their Learning About the Concept of Energy. Science & Education, 25(9). 951-975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9860-4
• Minor, J. y Boyce, G. A. (2018). Smokey and the pyropolitics of United States forest governance. Political Geography, 62, 79-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.10.005
• National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 Stem education. Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/13158.
• Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2020). El desarrollo competencial en la Educación Primaria: efectos de una propuesta STEAM integrada (Tesis doctoral). Recuperado de: https://riubu.ubu.es/handle/10259/5521
• Ortiz-Revilla, J., Adúriz-Bravo, A. y Greca I. M. (2020). A framework for epistemological discussion on integrated STEM education. Science & Education, 29(4), 857-880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00131-9
• Ortiz-Revilla, J., Sanz-Camarero, R. y Greca, I. M. (2021). Una mirada crítica a los modelos teóricos sobre educación STEAM integrada. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 87(2), 13-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35362/rie8724634
• Ortiz-Revilla, J., Greca, I. M. y Arriasecq, I. (2022) A theoretical framework for integrated STEM education. Science & Education, 31(2), 383-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00242-x
• Padgen, A. (2013). The Enlightenment and Why It still Matters. Oxford University Press.
• Pausas, J. G., (2015). Evolutionary fire ecology: lessons learned from pines. Trends in Plant Sciences, 20(5), 318-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.001
• Pausas, J. G. y Keeley, J. E. (2019), Widfires as an ecosystem service. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 17(5), 289-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2044
• Pielke, R. A. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818110
• Pérez-Rodríguez, L. A., Quintano, C., García-Llamas, P., Fernández-García, V. y Taboada, A. (septiembre, 2019). Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) for forest damge monitoring in south-western Europe [Presentation of paper]. Imaging Spectrometry XXIII: Applications, Sensors, and Processing, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2531265
• Prachagool, V. y Nuangchalerm, P. (2019). Investigating understanding the Nature of Science. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(4), 719-725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20282
• Quintanilla, M. A. (2017). Tecnología: un enfoque filosófico y otros ensayos de filosofía de la tecnología. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
• Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania. Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26. Recuperado de: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ821633
• Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P. y Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: a systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
• Thompson, M. P. y Calkin, E. C. (2011). Uncertainty and risk in wildland fire management: a review. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1895-1909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.015
• Toma, R. B. y García-Carmona, A. (2021). «De STEM nos gusta todo menos STEM». Análisis crítico de una tendencia educativa de moda. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 39(1), 65-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3093
• Unión Europea (2006). Science education now: a renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Recuperado de: https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/resources/docs/rapportrocardfinal.pdf
• Unión Europea (2015). Science education for responsible citizenship. Recuperado de: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/12626
• Unión Europea (2018a). Science career plans of adolescents: patterns trends and gender divide. https://doi.org/10.2760/251627
• Unión Europea (2018b). Sparking firemsmart policies in the EU. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2777/181450
• Unión Europea, (2021). Citizen science for policy across Europe. Recuperado de: https://eu-citizen.science/static/site/files/EU-Citizen_Science_2021_report-policy-event.pdf
• Vázquez, A. y Manassero, M. A. (2008). El declive de las actitudes hacia la ciencia de los estudiantes: un indicador inquietante para la educación científica. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 5(3), 274-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2008.v5.i3.03