Student Perceptions of Formative Assessment and Cooperative Work on a Technical Engineering Course
-
1
Universidad de Burgos
info
ISSN: 2071-1050
Any de publicació: 2020
Volum: 12
Número: 11
Pàgines: 4569
Tipus: Article
Altres publicacions en: Sustainability
Indicadors
Cites rebudes
JCR (Journal Impact Factor)
- Any 2020
- Factor d'impacte de la revista: 3.251
- Factor d'impacte sense autocites: 2.355
- Article influence score: 0.462
- Quartil major: Q2
- Àrea: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Quartil: Q2 Posició en l'àrea: 124/274 (Edició: SCIE)
- Àrea: ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Quartil: Q2 Posició en l'àrea: 59/125 (Edició: SSCI)
- Àrea: GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Quartil: Q3 Posició en l'àrea: 6/9 (Edició: SSCI)
- Àrea: GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Quartil: Q3 Posició en l'àrea: 30/44 (Edició: SCIE)
SCImago Journal Rank
- Any 2020
- Impacte SJR de la revista: 0.612
- Quartil major: Q1
- Àrea: Geography, Planning and Development Quartil: Q1 Posició en l'àrea: 174/818
- Àrea: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment Quartil: Q2 Posició en l'àrea: 81/499
- Àrea: Energy Engineering and Power Technology Quartil: Q2 Posició en l'àrea: 73/920
- Àrea: Environmental Science (miscellaneous) Quartil: Q2 Posició en l'àrea: 94/381
- Àrea: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Quartil: Q2 Posició en l'àrea: 134/410
CIRC
- Ciències Socials: A
Scopus CiteScore
- Any 2020
- CiteScore de la revista: 3.9
- Àrea: Geography, Planning and Development Percentil: 84
- Àrea: Environmental Science (miscellaneous) Percentil: 83
- Àrea: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Percentil: 70
- Àrea: Energy Engineering and Power Technology Percentil: 65
- Àrea: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment Percentil: 58
Journal Citation Indicator (JCI)
- Any 2020
- JCI de la revista: 0.56
- Quartil major: Q3
- Àrea: ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Quartil: Q3 Posició en l'àrea: 111/156
- Àrea: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Quartil: Q3 Posició en l'àrea: 163/306
- Àrea: GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Quartil: Q3 Posició en l'àrea: 38/66
Dimensions
(Dades actualitzats a data de 26-02-2023)- Cites totals: 9
- Cites recents: 8
- Field Citation Ratio (FCR): 10.2
Resum
Formative Assessment and Cooperative Work (FACW) is a teaching methodology that promotes student learning based on peer support, both in solving problems and identifying the mistakes made through feedback. The perceptions of 49 mechanical engineering students at the University of Burgos are analyzed in this article with regard to their first practical experience of FACW methodology in a technical subject, characterized by a highly complex content and a strong link between theoretical and practical concepts. The responses of the students to two blocks of open questions were evaluated in a qualitative, mixed, and statistical analysis. Various aspects that the students raised in relation to FACW could therefore be studied, such as their points of view towards: (1) The usefulness of FACW teaching modality; and (2) their preferences regarding the optimum teaching modality. The results showed that, although the students expressed favorable opinions towards FACW, they did not consider, in general, that teamwork was necessary for optimal learning, revealing a clear dependence on formal classroom presentations for the explanation of theoretical concepts. Students considered that theoretical concepts could not be autonomously acquired. Therefore, the application of the FACW teaching methodology to these courses could be especially beneficial to favor autonomous learning and to develop teamwork skills, training engineers with the right knowledge and skills today for tomorrow’s world.
Referències bibliogràfiques
- Frederiksen, (2013), Alta. J. Educ. Res., 59, pp. 442
- 10.1080/14703297.2018.1444503
- 10.1080/03075079.2018.1564258
- Ezhov, (2016), Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ., 11, pp. 9169
- 10.1108/JARHE-11-2017-0144
- 10.1080/03323315.2014.984387
- 10.3390/su12020460
- 10.1186/s41239-018-0097-y
- Yan, (2018), Int. J. Eng. Educ., 34, pp. 1876
- De la Fuente Arias, (2010), Psicothema, 22, pp. 806
- 10.1080/0309877X.2014.984600
- 10.1108/00400910610671311
- 10.1080/13636820.2014.894554
- 10.1007/978-3-319-50734-7_6
- 10.1080/02602938.2018.1530341
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103833
- 10.1080/02602938.2018.1446508
- Alcalá, (2016), Opcion, 32, pp. 865
- Alcalá, (2016), Estud. Pedagog., 42, pp. 207
- 10.3390/su11205772
- 10.3390/su12073010
- 10.3390/su11205748
- 10.1007/s10209-017-0588-y
- 10.1111/jedm.12234
- 10.1080/09500693.2019.1663452
- 10.1108/IJLLS-11-2015-0041
- 10.1007/s10798-013-9256-6
- 10.1080/02602938.2019.1643449
- 10.1080/09639284.2018.1477056
- 10.5430/ijhe.v8n1p23
- 10.1080/02607476.2012.656443
- 10.13189/ujer.2020.080515
- 10.3390/su12031200
- 10.1186/s13643-015-0011-9
- 10.1007/s10734-010-9355-1
- 10.1177/1356389019870211
- 10.37200/IJPR/V24I7/PR270352
- (2019)
- 10.1177/1077800413482097
- 10.1111/an.2004.45.1.10.1
- 10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100329
- (2020)
- Lebec, (2015), JECT, 26, pp. 25
- 10.1080/03075079.2020.1725875
- 10.19030/jier.v7i5.6111
- 10.1080/10511970903147861
- 10.1080/1360144X.2012.696195
- Jensen, (2011), Bioscene, 37, pp. 30
- 10.1002/jee.20197
- 10.1080/03043797.2020.1714549
- 10.1080/03075079.2018.1534094
- 10.1007/s10734-013-9684-y
- 10.1016/j.tate.2020.103064
- Fraile, (2013), Aula Abierta, 41, pp. 23
- 10.35940/ijitee.J9336.0881019
- 10.1174/113564011798392451
- 10.4995/redu.2009.6232
- 10.1080/03043797.2017.1289500