Satisfacción de los estudiantes con la docencia online en tiempos de COVID-19

  1. María Consuelo Sáiz Manzanares
  2. Juan Casanova
  3. José Alberto Lencastre
  4. Leandro S. Almeida
  5. Luis Jorge Martín Antón
Revue:
Comunicar: Revista científica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación

ISSN: 1134-3478

Année de publication: 2022

Número: 70

Pages: 35-45

Type: Article

DOI: 10.3916/C70-2022-03 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

Résumé

Higher education is one of the driving forces behind the social and economic development of countries, with the ultimate aim of providing quality academic training. At present, teaching-learning models in virtual environments face a number of important challenges, particularly in the current situation caused by COVID-19. Some of these challenges will be addressed in this study. We worked with 225 third-year undergraduate students in health science degrees over two academic years during the pandemic. The objectives were: (1) to ascertain whether there were significant differences in student satisfaction with the teaching process in the first year of the pandemic (e-learning teaching) vs. the second year (b-learning teaching); (2) to determine whether there were significant differences in academic performance between the two groups. Quantitative research (using a 2x2 factorial design, ANOVA and ANCOVA) and qualitative research (using a comparative design with categorisation analysis) were carried out. The results indicate differences in some aspects of satisfaction and learning outcomes in favour of teaching in the second of the two years. Students rated the use of active methodologies and technological resources positively, although they concluded that their use required more work time. Future studies will seek to compare student satisfaction in other areas of knowledge.

Références bibliographiques

  • Anguera, M.T., Blanco-Villaseñor, A., Losada, J.L., & Portell, M. (2018). Guidelines for designing and conducting a study that applies observational methodology. Anuario de Psicologia, 48, 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpsic.2018.02.001
  • Atlas.ti (Ed.) (2020). Software package qualitative data analysis. (Versión 9). [Software]. Atlas.ti. https://atlasti.com
  • Azevedo, R., & Gasevic, D. (2019). Analyzing multimodal multichannel data about self-regulated learning with advanced learning technologies: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 207-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.025
  • Bandalos, D.L., & Finney, S.J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides, & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269-296). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601858
  • Bonami, B.P. (2020). Education, big data and artificial intelligence: Mixed methods in digital platforms. [Educación, big data e inteligencia artificial: Metodologías mixtas en plataformas digitales]. Comunicar, 65, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.3916/C65-2020-04
  • Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (2005). Diseños experimentales y cuasiexperimentales en la investigación social. Amorrortu. https://bit.ly/3i1GKS4
  • Carbonero, M.A., Román, J.M., & Ferrer, M. (2013). Programa para “aprender estratégicamente” con estudiantes universitarios: Diseño y validación experimental. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 876-885. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.165671
  • Casanova, J.R., Cervero, A., Núñez, J.C., Almeida, L.S., & Bernardo, A. (2018). Factors that determine the persistence and dropout of university students. Psicothema, 30(4), 408-414. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.155
  • Chakma, U., Li, B., & Kabuhung, G. (2021). Creating online metacognitive spaces: Graduate research writing during the covid-19 pandemic. Issues in Educational Research, 31(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.3316/informit.748747335200300
  • Commission to the european parliament (Ed.) (2020). Communication from the Commission to the european parliament, the council, the european economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. https://bit.ly/3kwseDh
  • Diaz, M., & Walsh, B. (2021). Telesimulation-based education during COVID-19. Clinical Teacher, 18(2), 121-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13273
  • Flick, U. (2014). El diseño de la investigación cualitativa. Morata.
  • García-Peñalvo, F.J. (2021). Avoiding the dark side of digital transformation in teaching. An institutional reference framework for elearning in higher education. Sustainability, 13(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042023
  • García-Perales, R., & Almeida, L. (2019). An enrichment program for students with high intellectual ability: Positive effects on school adaptation. [Programa de enriquecimiento para alumnado con alta capacidad: Efectos positivos para el currículum]. Comunicar, 60, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.3916/C60-2019-04
  • Garcia-Utrera, L., Figueroa-Rodriguez, S., & Esquivel-Gámez, I. (2014). Modelo de sustitución, aumento, modificación, y redefinición (SAMR): Fundamentos y aplicaciones. In I. Esquivel-Gámez (Ed.), Los modelos tecno-educativos: Revolucionando el aprendizaje del siglo XXI. DSAE-Universidad Veracruzana. https://bit.ly/3ikS7n8
  • Hernandez-Armenteros, J., & Pérez-García, J.A. (2018). La universidad española en cifras 2017-2018. CRUE. https://bit.ly/3hIMLTw
  • IBM Corp (Ed.) (2016). SPSS Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (Versión 24). [Software]. IBM. https://ibm.co/3hWIls7
  • Kidess, M., Schmid, S.C., Pollak, S., Gschwend, J.E., Berberat, P.O., & Autenrieth, M.E. (2021). Virtual skills-training in urology: Teaching at the Technical University of Munich during the COVID-19-pandemic. Der Urologe, 60(4), 484-490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-020-01431-2
  • Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70. https://bit.ly/3hMpcci
  • Leal-Filho, W., Wall, T., Rayman-Bacchus, L., Mifsud, M., Pritchard, D.J., Lovren, V.O., Farinha, C., Petrovic, D.S., & Balogun, A.L. (1213). Impacts of COVID-19 and social isolation on academic staff and students at universities: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 21, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11040-z
  • Li, W., Gillies, R., He, M., Wu, C., Liu, S., Gong, Z., & Sun, H. (2021). Barriers and facilitators to online medical and nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives from international students from lowand middle-income countries and their teaching staff. Human Resources for Health, 19(64), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-021-00609-9
  • Lowe, A., Pararajasingam, A., & Goodwin, R.G. (2021). A paradigm shift in trainee confidence in teledermatology and virtual working during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of a follow-up UK-wide survey. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 46(3), 544-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.14498
  • Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Joint Research Centre (JRC) Science for Policy report. https://bit.ly/3exbvfn
  • Redefinición. Los modelos tecno-educativos: Revolucionando el aprendizaje del siglo XXI. DSAE-Universidad Veracruzana, (pp. 205-220).
  • Román-Sánchez, J.M., & Gallego-Rico, S. (2008). ACRA. Estrategias de aprendizaje. TEA.
  • Sáiz-Manzanares, M.C. (2018). E-project based learning en terapia ocupacional: Una aplicación en la asignatura «Estimulación Temprana». Universidad de Burgos. https://bit.ly/3rxKJsw
  • Sáiz-Manzanares, M.C., Marticorena-Sánchez, R., Muñoz-Rujas, N., Rodríguez-Arribas, S., Escolar-Llamazares, M.C., Alonso-Santander, N., Martínez-Martín, M.A., & Mercado-Val, E.I. (2021). Teaching and learning styles on moodle: An analysis of the effectiveness of using stem and non-stem qualifications from a gender perspective. Sustainability, 13(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031166
  • Salinas-Ibáñez, J., & De-Benito, B. (2020). Construction of personalized learning pathways through mixed methods. [Construcción de itinerarios personalizados de aprendizaje mediante métodos mixtos]. Comunicar, 65, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.3916/C65-2020-03
  • Sarwa, M., Rosnelli, R., Triatmojo, W., & Priyadi, M. (2021). Implementation of Flipped Classroom on experiences in online learning during pandemic COVID-19 for a Project-Base Vocational Learning Guide. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, (1), 1842-1842. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012019
  • Sucha, V., & Gamme, J.F. (2021). Humans and societies in the age of artificial intelligence. https://bit.ly/3io4I8R
  • Tang, Y.M., Chen, P.C., Law, K.M.Y., Wu, C.H., Lau, Y., Guan, J., He, D., & Ho, G.T.S. (2021). Comparative analysis of student’s live online learning readiness during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in the higher education sector. Computers & Education, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104211
  • Unesco (Ed.) (2019). Marco de competencias de los docentes en materia de TIC. Unesco. https://bit.ly/2UWub13
  • United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs (Ed.) (2021). Agenda for sustainable development and the SDGs.